Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Sacred Haven of DebaucheryAuto-translated
Well, my mother has been dead for several years, and my father lives separately and doesn't pay for me. Got it? I only visit the forum when I have free time, unlike some other people who are always online. And luckily, I don't threaten others with "we'll beat you and your clan," and after being refused, I don't say "you have no honor," lol. I'm not the type of person who proudly declares, "The computer is the meaning of my life; I didn't even sleep or go to school because of it." I could go on for a while, but you consistently embarrass yourself on this forum. That's all.
Well, my mother has been dead for several years, and my father lives separately.
I suspected as much. It seems no one was there to raise you properly.
You consistently embarrass yourself on this forum.
Heh.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
What's the point? If you're sure that everyone but you is wrong:
Nowadays, a lot is written about this, and it's all wrong.
Actually, here's the Great Soviet Encyclopedia (if you even know what that is), meaning it was written long ago:
Lord (lord, in its original meaning – master, head of a household, family, from Anglo-Saxon hlaford, literally – keeper, protector of bread), 1) originally in medieval England in a general sense – a feudal landowner (lord of the manor, landlord) and the suzerain of his vassals, in a more specific sense – a large feudal lord, a direct vassal of the king – a baron. Gradually, the title of Lord became a collective title for the English upper nobility (dukes, marquises, counts, vicounts, barons), which is granted (since the 14th century) to peers of the kingdom, who make up the upper house of the British Parliament – the House of Lords. The title of Lord is passed down through the male line and seniority, but can also be granted by the crown (on the recommendation of the Prime Minister). Since the 19th century, it has been granted ("for special merits") not only to large landowners, as was customary before, but also to representatives of large capital, as well as some figures in science, culture, etc. Until 1958, seats in the House of Lords were filled only by inheritance of this title. Since 1958, the monarch has appointed part of the members of the House of Lords, and the appointed Lords sit in the House for life, their title is not inherited. In 1963, hereditary Lords received the right to renounce their title.
It seems someone failed to raise you properly, teaching you how to behave like a human being.
Apparently, you equate being human with being a boor who immediately yells, "I'll punch your face if you don't shut up!" It's sad that you have such a poor opinion of people.
Omega, I have read everything you wrote, and not just once. And this text only reinforces that I am right. The fact is that before the revolution, before that accursed Lenin came to power, my ancestors were very influential and wealthy people. For example, my great-grandfather served as a general in the tsarist army, and therefore, he is automatically considered a nobleman. So, if we are talking about the right to bear the title of Lord, then I think I am not that far from the truth in this regard. "Lord" in English means "master." That is, it is in the English manner. In addition, as you yourself have already pointed out, it is passed down by seniority. I am the eldest in the family, and my grandfather and father are the only children. So, that's how it is. Sometimes I even want to restore the family tree, but unfortunately, I don't have enough money yet.
But I'm not forcing anyone, on the other hand, to address me as Lord. But you shouldn't call me de Sade either. Let's put an end to this nonsense.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
WerevolkaLord is not strictly a title, but a general term for any titled nobleman, so in this context, it is not used.
Ahem, you don't know much about the hierarchy in nobility and forms of address.Ver wrote correctly, didn't she? She wrote that "lord" is not a title, and you are writing the same thing now. So what was the point of attacking Werevolka?
There was no criticism. She wrote that it shouldn't be used in that context. It was a mistake.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
In this context, it wasn't actually mentioned. Yes, such references are common in games and modern fantasy, but how many fantasy writers or game developers are well-versed in history? It's the same as writing "Businessman Peter Petrovich" or "Employee Peter Petrovich" on the door of an office. We don't speak like that. It would say "Director Peter Petrovich" or "System Administrator Peter Petrovich" or another job title. That's what I was talking about.
The fact that I'm not stupid, rude (there is impoliteness in communication, but that's something else), and not uncultured. Also, I don't resemble part of the crowd; rather, I'm more of an outsider. In short, this definition doesn't apply to me, Morny.
Many people aren't stupid, rude, or unrefined. But almost everyone lives an ordinary life, not much different from others, and has similar views. So, it's incorrect to label someone as "uncultured" and someone else as not. I, for example, am unrefined, but rude. I won't claim to know about intelligence or lack thereof. Am I "uncultured"? You say you're an outsider and don't fit in with the crowd, but there are plenty of such outsiders. Does that make you not "uncultured"? If so, then there's a very large number of people who aren't "uncultured," even though there should be very few of them. I suppose there's your group, an "uncultured" group, and "normal people" who don't fall into either of these extremes, but they all live and think in a similar way. They study and work, live off their relatives, have preferences and dislikes. And what's the difference then?
It lies in what they resort to in case of disagreements (not the most critical ones, like an offensive remark), for example. A boor will threaten "retribution" or something similar, while a reasonable person will simply ignore it (or, as an alternative, get angry and calm down, but will still not threaten "retribution"). Although, I don't deny that there is some truth in what you said.
Ple-Sen
Саня Изи
