HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

Posts from What is your opinion about Heroes IV?

General
3.5 (11 ratings)
Closed
Heroes of Might and Magic IV is...
21 voters
Multiple choice Closed 2006-02-20
This poll is closed.
A revolution in the series
28.6% 6 votes
Favorite game in the series
9.5% 2 votes
Failed experiment
52.4% 11 votes
They aren't heroes at all (what were NWC thinking?)
0% 0 votes
Just an upgrade for HoMM3
0% 0 votes
Other (please specify)
19% 4 votes
In reply to vpatachek
User Avatar
Offline Wistrit
Registered:
Posts: 11,947
#939
Auto-translated
What should be improved? The hero leveling system? But I'm not playing Diablo.
I deliberately don't take more than two heroes in the fourth game (and preferably one), I like it better, and I think having multiple heroes is unnecessary. They could at least set a limit, like 2-3 heroes.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Happy Life
Registered:
Posts: 24,118
#940
Auto-translated
Vissy theorizes while lounging on the couch. Not only is it impossible to immediately acquire seven heroes, but the experience is also divided equally among everyone, giving each member of the group only meager portions. Besides, post #869 contains a truth. In general, it has been observed that almost in all cases, those who say "the fourth game was bad, the third was great" are newcomers for whom the third game was their first.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
Offline Wistrit
Registered:
Posts: 11,947
#941
Auto-translated
To reach level 15, for example, the experience gained by five heroes is quite sufficient; that's generally how skills are developed.
I would rather play Heroes 3 or 4 with my friends and some drinks. I don't enjoy other game modes in Heroes 3 and 4.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Wistrit
User Avatar
Offline vpatachek
Registered:
Posts: 26
#945
Auto-translated
WisTrit
What should I improve? Hero leveling? But I'm not playing Diablo.
I deliberately don't take more than two heroes in the fourth game (and preferably one), I like it better, and I think multi-hero gameplay is unnecessary. They could at least set a limit, 2-3 heroes.
I also keep no more than two heroes in one army. You won't get enough experience for all of them. And no one forces you to take more heroes than you need. In general, multi-hero gameplay is a useful thing – you distribute artifacts among the heroes, and each hero of an advanced class in one army will give it its own bonus, etc.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to vpatachek
User Avatar
Offline Alexsander13
Registered:
Posts: 130
#949
Auto-translated
vpatachek
I also don't keep more than two heroes in one army. You won't get enough experience for everyone. And no one forces you to take more heroes than you need. In general, having multiple heroes is a useful thing – you distribute artifacts among the heroes, and each hero of an advanced class in one army will give it its own bonus, etc.

This is just my opinion, but it's worth taking at least 4 heroes, and each should level up in their own area of skills (like 1 runner, 1 tactician, and a couple of mages). This is very convenient on online maps; by the endgame, the heroes are almost always at least level 15, and there are 5 of them, not 1. I used to play only with a single hero, and that was fine, but the first online match showed that 4-5 heroes level up at almost the same rate as 1. One level 18 hero against 5 level 14-15 heroes will lose in 100 percent of cases, even with an army 2-3 times larger. That's all.


Тебя оскорбили - забудь...тебя унизили - прости...тебя ударили - вспомни всё и убей!!!
:smile10: :smile17: :smile19:

Армия* - это люди, собранные в одном месте с единственной целью: исправлять ошибки дипломатов.

Д. Дэниелз
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Azura
Registered:
Posts: 9
#950
Auto-translated
I love the entire series, but I still prefer Heroes 4 the most. Yes, I love RPGs, and yes, I'm completely in love with the fourth installment! I love the freedom of movement – Heroes 4 gave me that in spades.
Множащиеся альтернативы рождают реальности, реальности соприкасаются, мера их соприкосновения есть Любовь.

Герои Меча и Магии IV - моя слабость. Играю только в них, карты делаю только по ним. Остальные серии уважаю, кроме Героев V.
2
⚖️
0
Offline Mongoose113
Registered:
Posts: 7
#952
Auto-translated
Heroes 5 turned out the best, although at the time of Heroes 4's release, it was cool
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Mongoose113
User Avatar
Offline dnaop-wr
Registered:
Posts: 1,014
#953
Auto-translated
Mongoose113
Heroes 5 turned out to be the best, although at the time Heroes 4 was released, it was awesome.
I lost interest in Heroes 5 right away when I saw the announcement of this game on TV. However, later I installed it a couple of times, tried playing – and uninstalled it, it just didn't click with me. In the Wake of Gods also didn't click. But both the original Heroes 3 and Heroes 4 are still great, each in its own way, and they haven't lost their appeal. :smile02:
Техника в руках индейца мертва.
Справочник по НоММ-4 http://handbookhmm.ru/pamyatka-dlya-heroes-iv.html
Памятка по НоММ-3 http://handbookhmm.ru/pamyatka-dlya-homm-iii.html
и HotA http://handbookhmm.ru/vyishla-obnovlennaya-pamyatka-dlya-homm-iii-hota.html
0
⚖️
0
In reply to dnaop-wr
User Avatar
Offline Dr Motor
Registered:
Posts: 382
#954
Auto-translated
dnaop-wr
Both the original third game and the fourth game are great, each in its own way, and they haven't lost their appeal:smile02:
My interest in the third game waned after I discovered the fourth. Although, I don't play the original, but rather the "Equilibrium" version.

I tried the fifth game, but I didn't really get it. Maybe I just didn't give it enough time. I think I'll like it if I play it properly. The fourth game appealed to me because of its clever hero development system and the lack of monster upgrades. So, I think I can also get hooked on the fifth game; at first glance, it also has a very interesting skill system.

Думающий поймет. Действующий совершит. Дорогу осилит идущий ©
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Zybr
Registered:
Posts: 7,033
#955
Auto-translated
I tried the fifth one, but I didn't understand anything. Maybe I just didn't give it enough time. I think I'll like it if I play it properly. The fourth one attracted me with its clever hero development system and the absence of any monster upgrades. So, I think I can also get hooked on the fifth one; at first glance, it also has a very interesting skill system.
It's generally interesting, but I didn't like the ATB scale. When units take turns 4 times in a row, it's not very appealing to me. But currently, the fifth one is the best for online play. It has simultaneous turns.


Барон "Vampires"

Отдай свои прошлые сны,
В сомненьях себя обрети,
В бешеном танце душа кружится!
Не думай, что будет потом,
Здесь и сейчас мы живем,
Стань хоть на миг сам собой, слышишь!


0
⚖️
0
In reply to Magnus
User Avatar
Offline Rainer
Registered:
Posts: 645
#956
Auto-translated
The music is beautiful :) The units are so-so, I'd give them a 3 out of 5, but I especially liked that there are a lot of maps :) and the editor is easy to use. So, 8 out of 10.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline MORTUS
Registered:
Posts: 20
#957
Auto-translated
4 were my first heroes, and I am very happy with the game. After playing other Heroes games, I didn't change my opinion.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Sinistar
Registered:
Posts: 26
#958
Auto-translated
I chose the "unsuccessful experiment" option. There were indeed many new ideas, and some of them were quite good, but the implementation...
Цвета ночи гранитные склоны,
Цвета крови сухая земля,
И янтарные очи дракона
Отражает кусок хрусталя -
Я сторожу этот клад...
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Ethereal
Registered:
Posts: 507
#959
Auto-translated
The implementation is quite good. The AI is admittedly as dumb as a cork, but playing against a human player becomes truly interesting. :)
Вдруг, откуда ни возьмись, ниоткуда не взялось.

Музыкальное оформление.
0
⚖️
0