Skip to content

Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery

4.3 (23 ratings)
Closed
What shall we name the establishment?
28 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
“Flooding.” Simple and effective
17.9% 5 votes
Leave it as is – “Fludnyak”
7.1% 2 votes
“A den of debauchery.” How original!
39.3% 11 votes
Brewery
17.9% 5 votes
Another option (specify in the subject line)
17.9% 5 votes
User Avatar
#41857
Auto-translated
Yeah, I didn't want to post anything more. Although, based on socionics, maybe I'll post one more thing, and that's it. It would be interesting to compare it to what I had before.
User Avatar
#41858
Auto-translated
What difference does it make? It’s obvious that you’re Dost.
User Avatar
#41859
Auto-translated
my test showed a different result.
User Avatar
#41860
Auto-translated
Archik, tests are not indicative.
User Avatar
#41861
Auto-translated
yes. I won't post this test because it's divided into two parts and has few questions. In one, they mentioned Balzac, and in the other, Gaben. But each part contains a grain of truth.
At first, it might seem like he's doing everything casually, without much effort. But gradually, you begin to understand that his unhurriedness reflects the overall rhythm of life: a combination of freedom and efficiency. Talented laziness. He won't work aimlessly. A born inventor, but he doesn't rush to implement his ideas until the conditions are right for maximum impact. He takes pride in his ability not to do anything that doesn't bring benefit.
and I need Hexley.
okay, see ya.

how are you?
User Avatar
#41862
Auto-translated
I won't post this test because it's divided into two parts and has few questions. In one, they mentioned Balzac, and in the other, Gaben. But there's a grain of truth in each.
Arch, you're definitely not Balzac, not even close. And you don't really resemble Gaben either.
In reply to Ple-Sen
User Avatar
#41863
Auto-translated
Socionics is nonsense.
Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made
User Avatar
#41864
Auto-translated
I am partially like each of them. I am a composite image.
User Avatar
#41865
Auto-translated
Socionics is silly.
Yes, there's not much intelligence in it.
I'm partially like everyone. I'm a composite image.
It's determined by functions. And you, according to the functions, are Dostoevsky.
User Avatar
#41866
Auto-translated
Proof or lie.
User Avatar
#41867
Auto-translated
Need a spectacular, large-scale battle with lots of variety in melee combat? Play Counter-Strike.
Need subtle province management in a global strategy game? Play Solitaire!

Moderated: USE OF PROFANITY in the message

Fucking
drug addict.

But Vasya is great, he clearly and straightforwardly criticized the game. The mechanics need to be changed a long time ago; how long can we keep choking on the same crap?
*facepalm*
I hope he washed his hands before that. The campaigns in the Heroes games are of low quality, except perhaps for the fourth one, and even that's not certain.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
In reply to Happy Life
#41868
Auto-translated
Play Solitaire!
My Solitaire records haven't been beaten for several years at different jobs, and at home, they don't even try. So you're right. Lol.

And Vasya is great, he clearly and in a cool way expressed his opinion about the game.
You probably weren't very good with the Russian language and misspoke. It should have sounded like this: "Vasya is great, he tried to express his opinion in a one-sided way using railroad ties and throwing things over the fence, but he didn't do it well, but he can."
The mechanics should have been changed a long time ago, how long can we keep choking on the same crap?
The mechanics, on the contrary, have made up for all the parts. You can still tweak the options if you're really struggling with the mechanics.
The campaigns in the Heroes games are of low quality, except perhaps for the fourth one, and even that's not a fact.
*facepalm* what a shame, indeed
User Avatar
#41869
Auto-translated
Ar, in a way, is like Gaben – a sensory-logical type, Balzac is an intuitive-logical type; both are introverts, and you, based on your behavior, seem like a pure intuitive-ethical type. And yes, I agree that you are an introvert. So, it's either Dostoyevsky or Yesenin. However, to determine this accurately, you need to meet in real life, but you don't resemble Gaben at all, and you also seem too sensitive externally to be Balzac; they are more reserved.

"Let's fly to the most beautiful sky. No matter how many times your wings break, keep trying."©Crono Crusade

User Avatar
#41870
Auto-translated
In real life, I'm an introvert :P

No, I'm not an ethicist, but a logician.
User Avatar
#41871
Auto-translated
BAL
DOST
GAB
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.