Neutral creatures in Heroes of Might and Magic V. — General

GvozD

20 years ago

Auto-translated

How did I miss that dark knight? He's not exactly a looker, but he definitely needs a wardrobe change; otherwise, he looks like a toy from some Lego castle. That huge, ridiculous sword is proof of that. Even the greatest two-handed swords aren't that big, and here he is, wielding it with one hand. Ugh, it's disgusting. If things continue like this, I'll have no choice but to ignore the balancing and focus on criticizing (objectively and not so objectively) these pointless creatures:mad: :mad: :mad: !!! I have nothing against cartoonish 3D graphics, but everything should be stylish, not like this zoo. So, I'm on the verge; just a little more, and something will burst, and I'll mess up the whole Nival.:rolleyes:

In reply to GvozD

Vlad

20 years ago

Auto-translated

GvozD

Ugh, what a mess. If things continue like this, I'll have no choice but to ignore balance adjustments and focus entirely on criticizing (objectively and not so objectively) the pointless creatures:mad: :mad: :mad: !!! I have nothing against cartoonish 3D graphics, but everything should be stylish, not this zoo. So, I'm on the verge; just a little more, and something will burst, and I'll mess up the whole Nival.:rolleyes:

Here, you shouldn't get a warning for harsh criticism, especially if it includes swearing!

MasterPainKiller

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Yes, there are some flaws in the creatures in Heroes of Might and Magic V, not only in the neutral ones, but in general: - gargoyle - imp - phoenix - death knight This raises questions for many. I would definitely rework all of this if I were in Nival's place, although they already have enough problems. In general, they should be asked to at least add new models in a patch. [and the sketches can be used to create models from the 3rd game]

In reply to MasterPainKiller

Vlad

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Now it's clear why John Van Caneghem ended up working with Nival. He knew! He knew and didn't tell us anything. That's always how it happens...

GvozD

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Are there any other factions worth checking out? Maybe the others are better designed. And who else is considered neutral?

Никита

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Yes, the elementals look awful.

In reply to Никита

<garkin>

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Well, they really messed up the neutral creatures in the fourth game; it's calmed down now, but you still need to have some variety – you can't just turn a Phoenix into some painted chicken! You can tolerate the ugliness of the Elementals, but it's a sin to disfigure a Phoenix or a Death Knight... :( They should at least be a little ashamed....

In reply to <garkin>

Vlad

20 years ago

Auto-translated

They really messed up the neutral creatures in the fourth game, and while we've calmed down, we still need to have some standards – you can't just turn a Phoenix into some painted chicken! We can tolerate the ugliness of the Elementals, but it's a sin to disfigure the Phoenix and Death Knight... :( They should at least be a little ashamed....

Exactly, we all feel the same way:D :D :D :D
Question: How can we force Nival to redo the neutral creatures?
Answer: We need to wait for the release, dig into the game, and fix it ourselves!;)

Uke-by_HoMM![Zавулон]

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Tumbochka and Phoenix are awesome!!! But why is everyone so critical of the angel? I think it's perfectly fine (honestly, I even like it more than in the third game, and definitely more than in the fourth).

In reply to Uke-by_HoMM![Zавулон]

Tetragrammaton

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Uke-by_HoMM! [Zavulon]

The nightstand and Phoenix are awesome!!! But why is everyone so critical of the angel? I think it's perfectly normal (honestly, I like it even more than in the third and especially the fourth game).

I completely agree. The Gargoyle and Phoenix look a bit underwhelming. I would also like to mention the elementals (especially the air elemental). The angel is simply superb; as they say, beauty will save the world. However, there is one inconsistency here – in Christian tradition, angels do not have a gender.

In reply to Tetragrammaton

Night

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Tetragrammaton

Actually, I would also mention the elementals (especially the air elemental).

The air elf looks more like sticky tape than a representative of the element of air.

In reply to Tetragrammaton

Magnus

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Tetragrammaton

I completely agree. Gargoyle and Phoenix don't look very impressive. I would also mention the elementals (especially the air elemental). The Angel is simply superb; as they say, beauty will save the world, but here there is a slight inconsistency - in Christian tradition, angels do not have a gender.

I disagree. Where have you seen a female archangel? There are archangels: Gabriel, Michael, but there are no female ones:mad:
. And in Heroes 5, they are subordinate to the dragon. :eek: And the dragon is a symbol of the devil:eek:
This is a heresy in Heroes 5
And it will certainly have consequences for Ubisoft ;)
From the Catholics;)

In reply to Magnus

Night

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Magnus

I disagree. Where have you seen a female archangel? There are archangels like Gabriel and Michael, but no female ones:mad:. And in Heroes 5, they are subordinate to a dragon:eek:. And a dragon is a symbol of the devil:eek:. That's heresy in Heroes 5. It will be interesting to see how Ubisoft deals with this ;). From Catholics.

Tell me, who else besides us will delve into sources to prove the inaccuracy? Everyone will just play. It's a degradation, damn it.

In reply to Night

<garkin>

20 years ago

Auto-translated

Night

Tell me, please, who else besides us will delve into the sources to prove someone wrong? Everyone will just play. It's a degradation, damn it.

No offense, but I'll keep digging. I haven't calmed down until I found out where the developers took the following creatures from: nagas, wyverns, and efreets...