Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Unable to find a counterargument, Locken resorted to simply trolling me.
Okay... I'm starting to understand who Locken is.
2WisTrit What can I say? You're obsessed with your fictional elves and spout unsubstantiated nonsense. By the way, people aren't fools either, and if someone decided to wage a partisan war against the knights (and I think there were such idiots), then they would have come up with ways to fight them. So, your imbalance doesn't exist and couldn't exist.
If you were right, knighthood wouldn't exist at all, and everyone would be sitting in trees eating bananas.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
Die, heretic!
1) Elves don't eat bananas.
2) Guerrilla warfare quickly took out knights – and what's the point of guerrilla tactics? Shoot the horse, and the knight is done; he won't get up.
3) And elves will shoot the horse.
4) And humans invented gunpowder, and knights destroyed themselves.
Conclusion: someone needs to study the subject more.
Guerrilla warfare quickly took out the Knights – and what’s there to do in guerrilla warfare? Shoot the horse, and the Knight is finished; he won’t get up.
Proof or you know what
Die, heretic!
You die yourself
And people invented gunpowder, and the Knights destroyed themselves.
But elves will never invent it, due to their low IQ.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
The professor's elves are quite depressing. Of course, they are not like Salvatore's psychopaths (drow), but still, they are not very interesting. Because they are, so to speak, a people of "Mary Sues," and they are the best at almost everything (even Melkor stole their trinkets). However, this is perhaps only true of the Noldor.
Didn't explain or provide any reasoning. If, of course, you were talking about any knights, and not specifically about mounted ones. SOMEONE WROTE ON LURKMORE THAT MOUNTED ARBALESTS ARE NONSENSE!
2) As a matter of fact, guerrilla warfare quickly took down knights - and what's the point of guerrilla warfare if not to shoot the horse - the knight is done for, he won't get up.
Nonsense and rubbish. Shoot an innocent child or peasant? Easy. Did "Ololo" kill a horse with plates under a knight galloping across the field? Fanboy fiction.
Stupidity and nonsense. Shooting an innocent child or peasant? Easy. Did Oloolo kill a horse with plates under a knight galloping across the field? Fanboy fiction.
Yes, Oloolo. What do you think will happen to eighty kilograms of knight under fifty kilograms of iron if he falls off his horse at full speed? Of course, he will immediately get up and start chopping everyone left and right!
By the way, in the Middle Ages, every decent knight was taught to wield both a dagger and a crossbow.
What's there to learn? Its advantage lies in that – any peasant can shoot.
Secondly, even to pierce chainmail, you need a sharp iron tip.
Why pierce it if it already has a huge number of holes?
Yes, lol. What do you think will happen to an eighty-kilogram knight wearing fifty kilograms of iron if he falls off a horse at full speed? Of course, he will immediately get up and go around chopping everyone left and right!
They didn't take weak and feeble people to be knights. If he wants to live, he'll get up and go.
Наше оружие - неожиданность! Неожиданность и страх, страх и неожиданность - это два наших оружия! Плюс безжалостность - три наших оружия: страх, неожиданность и безжалостность! И ещё фанатичная преданность Папе - четвёртое! Наше оружие включает в себя... наше оружие включает в себя... страх, неожиданность... я сейчас!
2WisTrit What can I say? You're just obsessed with your fictional elves and spout unsubstantiated nonsense. By the way, people aren't fools either, and if someone decided to start such a guerrilla war against the Knights (and I think there were such idiots), then they would have come up with ways to fight them. So, there is no imbalance, and there cannot be.
No, you are. You're obsessed with the Knights and think they're the coolest. People, on the other hand, are fools. The Knights have repeatedly fallen for simple and straightforward guerrilla tactics; in the same Ice Battle, neither mounted crossbowmen, nor heavy armor, nor three-meter swords helped them. There is no imbalance, which is what I'm saying; there are many Knights, but they suck.
Proof or you know what
Why do you need proof if you can't reason logically? Even if I film a video of a Knight falling off his horse and not getting up (in the best case, he remains alive but unable to get up), you will still insist on something of your own.
And the elves will never come up with it, due to their low IQ.
It's just a battle-hardened opinion!
Didn't tell and didn't justify. If, of course, you were talking about any Knights, and not specifically about mounted ones. THEY WROTE ON LURKMORE THAT MOUNTED CROSSBOWMEN ARE NONSENSE!
I told and justified. You're just a fan of Lurkmore and chan forums; I found the article by chance when I wanted to find pictures for Lord.
Stupidity and nonsense. Shoot an innocent child or peasant? Easy. Did Olo-lo kill a horse with plates under a Knight galloping across the field? Fanboy fiction.
Yes, easily! The horse won't be able to handle such heavy armor anyway. And even with medium armor, it loses most of its already minimal maneuverability due to the Knight.
Weak and feeble people were not taken as Knights. If he wants to live, he will get up and go.
- Hello - Hi - Will you live? - Yes - Go
Tomorrow holds no promises Except the ones we've made
Knights have repeatedly fallen victim to simple and straightforward partisan tactics.
There are many knights.
Knights are just one-tenth of the army. Their main purpose is field battles, wall against wall. What use is partisan tactics to them if they won't even enter a forest? Let other types of troops handle that. Lighter, more maneuverable, and not so narrowly specialized.
It's easy! The armor is too heavy; the horse can't handle it. And even in medium armor, it loses most of its already minimal maneuverability due to the knight.
There is a breed of horse called a destrier. 800-1000 kg. It doesn't jump. It gets tired quickly. It is used only in battle, as is combat armor. The horse is tall; an infantryman can't easily reach it with a sword – and even if they could, a wall of such horses will easily break any formation not equipped with polearms.
Наше оружие - неожиданность! Неожиданность и страх, страх и неожиданность - это два наших оружия! Плюс безжалостность - три наших оружия: страх, неожиданность и безжалостность! И ещё фанатичная преданность Папе - четвёртое! Наше оружие включает в себя... наше оружие включает в себя... страх, неожиданность... я сейчас!
Knights are only one-tenth of the army. Their main purpose is field battles, wall against wall. What use is guerrilla tactics for them if they won't even enter the forest? Let other types of troops handle that. More mobile and versatile ones.
exactly. I'm just saying that people are arguing about the "Hunters")
Added 1 minute ago
Weak and feeble people weren't accepted as knights. If he wants to live, he'll get up and go.
The point isn't whether he's weak or strong. It's just that it will be uncomfortable for him to get up in full armor. He won't be able to put it on himself or get up from the ground.
the point isn't whether he's weak or strong. It's simply that it will be uncomfortable for him to stand in full armor. He won't be able to put it on himself, nor will he be able to get up from the ground.
As if I didn't understand. The myth about the impossibility of standing up originated from tournament armor, which weighs around 70 kilograms. Even plate armor weighs twice as little and is much more comfortable. And it appeared already at the decline of knighthood. Before that, chainmail, plate, and scale armor were used, which are even lighter and restrict movement less. Moreover, the head and torso were protected first. Most knights didn't have greaves or vambraces, at most chainmail shirts and trousers over leather ones.
Наше оружие - неожиданность! Неожиданность и страх, страх и неожиданность - это два наших оружия! Плюс безжалостность - три наших оружия: страх, неожиданность и безжалостность! И ещё фанатичная преданность Папе - четвёртое! Наше оружие включает в себя... наше оружие включает в себя... страх, неожиданность... я сейчас!
Саня Изи
Ple-Sen
