Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

They crawled out from under the bridges and soared into the sky

By the way, I read a thread about the Cattell test, and to avoid derailing it: I recently conducted quite extensive testing using various test assignments and discovered, believe it or not, a person with high introversion and high sociability. Theoretically, this is possible – after all, introversion is not a lack of sociability, but rather a focus on the inner world; it's just that as a rule, it's assumed that such a person will be unsociable, but no, there are also sociable introverts.
By the way, for those who have seen the Cattell test results and received "Moral norms are not sufficiently internalized!" – don't rejoice, you're not cynics; you're just irresponsible, because this parameter is somehow determined by questions like "Are you a responsible person?", where "no" gives a result indicating low moral norms. What's even worse, if you say that you are tolerant of sloppy people, you also get penalized in terms of morality. This is the only poorly designed parameter, although it's worth remembering that this was indeed very important in Cattell's time.

I am responsible and reliable. The test doesn't lie.

Yes, it’s strange; self-discipline is also slightly above average, but this isn’t reflected in their behavior.

These qualities are usually tested in real-life situations and during important tasks.

Actually, no. Half of the questions about self-discipline are exactly in the spirit of "Do you bring even the most insignificant of your tasks to completion?"

Minor tasks or those that don't require much time? I try to finish them, but sometimes with a delay. Recently, I also studied these letters on the right using my own results as an example, and I was pleased to learn something new. It even inspired me.

Literally, "those that seem insignificant."

I usually choose minor quests that don't take much time.

By the way, for those who saw the Kettell keys and received the message "Moral standards not sufficiently internalized!" – don't rejoice, you're not cynics, you're just irresponsible, because this parameter is somehow determined by questions like "Are you a responsible person?", where "no" results in a low moral standards score. What's even worse, if you say you are tolerant of sloppy people, you also get penalized in terms of morality.

is this bad?)

Added after 45 seconds

cynics

is this good?)

Just ask Ple-Sena which he’d rather be: a cynic or a slacker.

Irresponsible /= careless.

Added after 46 seconds

"Moral norms are not well enough understood!"

I don't see anything bad here, nor anything good.

There is another parameter – self-discipline. Almost everyone with low responsibility also has low self-discipline. The conclusions are quite clear.

Irresponsible /= careless

Irresponsible ~ careless

Ask Ple-Sen, which he would rather be – a cynic or a slacker.

I'm not happy about not being the first or the second. And yet, unfortunately, I am.

Added after 50 seconds
By the way, why Ple-Sen specifically?