Posts from Discussions on various topics. Lots of off-topic content.
Auto-translated
You can vote:
Added after 53 seconds
I also have Civ 4, and I'm glad that you can play multiplayer on the same computer.
I find "empire management" to be the most enjoyable part of the entire process.
If you only play the battles, you'll get bored because the battles can be very long, and towards the end, they become frequent.
Master of Orion?
Yeah, right. Into that.
TES: Morrowind 34
Dungeon Keeper 32
Diablo 1 36
Total War 24
Command & Conquer: Generals 54+
Meanwhile, I'm still annoyed about your "Dragon Age." I downloaded the second part and thought, "Why not play the first one before that?!" It was going well until I got to the siege of Denerim. At first, it was tolerable, but towards the end, when reinforcements arrive for the Archdemon, it becomes a real nightmare. There are probably only five frames per second, and it wouldn't be so bad if only the animation slowed down, but everything else slows down too. At the same time, characters take damage at a normal rate. You use a health potion or a mana potion, and the effect only happens a couple of minutes later, when the character is already dead. A mob that can be killed with one hit takes a crowd of ten guys to kill in tens of seconds, and so on. %)
Dungeon Keeper 32
Diablo 1 36
Total War 22 -
Command & Conquer: Generals 56 +
Haven't played it, but the description is interesting.
If the final battle with the Archdemon is lagging, I think the second dragon will constantly lag as well.
TES: Morrowind 34
Dungeon Keeper 34+
Diablo 1 36
Total War 20 -
Command & Conquer: Generals 56
Dungeon Keeper 34
Diablo 1 38+
Total War 20
Command & Conquer: Generals 54-
hello, Mold