Posts from Academy of Sciences of Heroesland Auto-translated

Wolves! Wolves! New! Trendy! Youthful!
You don't love wolves yet? Wolf-mania is coming to you! Wolves, wolves, wolves!
Kawaii ^_^
Simply adorable.
Magnificent!
....
Wolves!

Dragons are better.

A wolf can be tamed; if you take it when it's still young and feed it well, it will get used to you and become tame. But a dragon cannot be tamed. Although in cartoons they are sometimes tamed, it's just a fairy tale.

the word "theme" is associated with the topic. 100% accurate information.

I approve of the information.

Are you saying that a normal person doesn't associate the word "topic" with the word "discussion"? And what about the phrase "discuss a topic"? Or do normal people, like you, consider it a consequence of, let's say, a peculiar mindset?

You have completely misinterpreted the information I was trying to convey. Can I ask you a question in return? Do you enjoy jokes about "female logic"?

I don't care what you've seen. I'm not afraid to ask direct questions. I just don't want to pollute this topic with pointless trolling.

Don't see trolling in every step.

You have completely misinterpreted the information I was trying to convey.

Don't try to excuse yourself. I understood the information you wanted to convey. Do you think you can change my mind?

I think I aspire and yearn for it!

Okay, I'm here. I've read through it. There's a lot of interesting stuff written here. I was most interested in the idea that the universe has 12 dimensions, 3 coordinates, 3 velocities, and 3 accelerations, and the rest can be added as desired, but there's no point in doing so. Did I understand this point of view correctly? However, there are problems here: if we include velocity and acceleration, then, firstly, time is present here in an implicit form, and, secondly, derivatives of coordinates always depend in one way or another on the coordinates themselves and on time, therefore they are not the smallest possible set of coordinates. Although, initially, I meant in this question the existence of "invisible" dimensions, and if they exist, how can they affect the laws of physics? Do generalized forces exist that can move an object perpendicularly to our 4-dimensional space (something like the Lorentz force, which acts perpendicularly to the force vectors and the direction of motion of a charged particle, so that it can move this particle into another plane)? In this regard, Lord de Sat described the picture best, providing links to interesting sources and briefly describing their contents. Sorry, Imaris, but the wolf thing isn't really relevant. At least, not in this formulation. The following people have been accepted into the Academy: Elcedere WishmasteR

Sorry, Imaris, but the wolf thing isn't really relevant. At least, not in that formulation.

I wrote:
I didn't mean to discuss wolves in this thread.

I'd like to start a new discussion, specifically about global warming. First, some information: wikipedia
I want to draw particular attention to this:

Climate systems change as a result of both natural internal processes and in response to external influences, both anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic. Geological and paleontological data show the existence of long-term climate cycles, which in the Quaternary period took the form of periodic glaciations, and the present time falls within an interglacial period (see figure).

In general, I adhere to the theory of periodicity. Humans are unlikely to be able to significantly change the climate on Earth. The only way would be to cut down forests in quantities comparable to their total area. Otherwise, a slight increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will immediately lead to an increase in its consumption by plants, as the latter experience a significant deficiency of it in our conditions. Thus, its concentration will level out.
The periodicity theory suggests that, due to certain natural factors, the temperature on the planet experiences fluctuations (as claimed by the geographer who taught us in school and managed to earn my deep respect; the period of fluctuations is 300 years). I am inclined to believe this. Although this does not mean that we can slightly increase deforestation and emissions from factories into the atmosphere. But not because our climate might change significantly as a result, but because we can cause enormous harm to living creatures nearby, including humans (and especially humans).
This is my humble opinion. What do you think, colleagues?

Added 5 minutes later
Oh, I forgot. The melting of ice. This is really funny. It is believed that global warming leads to the melting of glaciers, which can raise the level of the world's oceans by several meters. Ha-ha, if the ice melts, it will significantly decrease in volume, because its density is less by a tenth! And where, I wonder, will the extra few meters of water come from?

As a follower of philosophy, I believe that God and universal Love will still save us. However, considering the strong influence of the Sun on our planet and its increasing activity, I think that these cycles are progressing with an increasing negative effect.

Who has seen the movie Inferno?

I wanted to take a look.

The beginning seems interesting, maybe I’ll take a look? :)

It reminded me of the game "Gothic Mars," although there doesn't seem to be anything in common between them, except for the space setting. I haven't even played it; I just have the disc. Maybe the characters were similar.

Zoya Lizard, please explain what "Inferno" has to do with this?