Skip to content

Posts from Анализ игры Oelm-KillerVampire

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#123
Auto-translated
Vic, I think I made myself clear. Anyone who has played SOD on 8mm will understand what I mean. As for the AK regulations, ban me already! The "Breech" faction was discussed before the decision was made.
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
In reply to Oelm
User Avatar
#124
Auto-translated
Oelm
Vik, I think I made myself clear.
Well, it's clear, but is it convincing?
Anyone who played SOD on 8mm will understand what I'm talking about.
Well, I played it. As you can see, I didn't understand :).

So, I agree that you exaggerated about 40-60% of the opponent's cheating, but that's not enough for the Championship.

But if you add the match with Ayman, the number exceeds the psychologically important mark of 90%.
In reply to Wicc
User Avatar
#125
Auto-translated
Getting three scrolls and 221 – that’s a unique occurrence! It’s never happened before in a regular game! And you’re responding by calling me a schoolkid? How is that possible? (sad)

For me, the probability here is 95% in favor of cheating.
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
In reply to Oelm
User Avatar
#126
Auto-translated
I haven't looked at the saves, so I won't comment on them, but regarding the "schoolboy" comment, I'll say that I personally take the risk from the beginning without any issues. Let me explain why. The chance of getting a bonus is equally likely. The parameter and spell (parameter if there's no spellbook) are acceptable to me. That's 66%. In the remaining 33%, we'll get a secondary skill. About a third of those will be suitable for us. So, 77% of the time, the bonus will be acceptable. For me, this probability is sufficient to justify the risk.
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
#127
Auto-translated
Dirty_Player
I haven't looked at the save files, so I won't comment on that, but regarding the "schoolboy" unit, I'll say that I take it on the early stages without hesitation. Let me explain why. The chance of getting a bonus is equally likely. The parameter and spell (parameter if there's no spellbook) are acceptable to me. That's 66%. In the remaining 33%, we'll get a secondary skill. About a third of those will be useful to us. So, 77% of the time, the bonus will be acceptable. For me, this is a probability high enough to justify the risk.
That's why I assess the probability of this not as 0%, but as, say, 20%. This is a common viewpoint, although the move is negative. But many people really want to take the risk, and that's their right.

I myself used to do this sometimes, before there was a script for the "schoolboy" unit. I saw Mike in Alaska take a "schoolboy" - he got a tent. He swore, then immediately took another one - and got an estate. Good thing they were playing with classes at the time :).
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#128
Auto-translated
Wlk777
And what kind of moderation is this that doesn't follow its own rules?


Yes, Oelm's topic was preserved. Whether this decision was right or wrong is up to you to judge.
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
In reply to Дубровин Павел
User Avatar
#129
Auto-translated
Dubrovin Pavel
Yes, the Oelm topic was preserved. Whether this decision was right or wrong is up to you to judge.
This is a reason to vote... ;)
In reply to Дубровин Павел
User Avatar
#130
Auto-translated
Dubrovin Pavel
Yes, the Oelm topic was preserved. Whether this decision was right or wrong is up to you to judge.
I don't understand why they wrote a set of rules if no one follows them.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#131
Auto-translated
Wlk777
I don't understand why they wrote a set of rules if no one follows them.
Here's someone who would complain... :)

You're only writing this because the forum rules weren't followed, and an exception was made, but unlike the rules of the Tournament Committee, these are set in stone.
In reply to Wicc
User Avatar
#132
Auto-translated
Valentin, according to the rules, you should have been permanently banned a long time ago. So, please, don't do that here!
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
In reply to Oelm
User Avatar
#133
Auto-translated
Oelm
Valentin, according to the rules, you should have been permanently banned a long time ago. So don't do that here!
Part of the points were given to me for a database violation that, as it turned out later, didn't warrant punishment. In general, the issue of violation points is debatable; it's like everywhere else in Russia – one person gets a conditional sentence for the same offense, while another gets a life sentence. And most importantly, everything is absolutely legal. I was banned for several months, though. And in general, it has nothing to do with the topic.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
User Avatar
#134
Auto-translated
Come on, there was some evidence... it wasn't just baseless accusations, but a discussion...
Всё не так плохо как Вы думаете. Всё намного хуже!
User Avatar
#135
Auto-translated
Holy cow, the first post really messes with your head ) And Vika's "justification" completely blows it up :)
Speaking of schoolboys, in my last game an unguarded schoolboy gave a loser Dimension Door... Meaning any magic is possible, + they give stats very often. It makes sense to take them. But after one critical game where I got diplomacy, ballistics, and some other trash, I don't take гг anymore.. )
Show your true face when losing. Make sure it`s not ugly.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Фёдор Фёдорович