Posts from Amnesty for Wlk777.

...and so, tell me, what did HeroesWorld gain by permanently banning Valentin? Lost a good player. I think if he wanted to, he would have created a clone long ago, as Kostya said, and kept playing here, but... IMHO, Valya is an unrestrained, emotional person, and above all, susceptible to provocations, but the main thing is, the person loves the game and plays honestly, as best he can.. In short, isn't it time to start another poll for unbanning WLK? :D The vote will show what the majority of the forum members want, and nobody has canceled democracy yet ;)

Indeed, that's interesting :smile26:

another 2-3 months of ban) and then you can even grant amnesty :)

another 2-3 months of ban) and then it can be amnestied :)

Does he even need it? While he was being threatened with a ban, he seemed to be on edge, because he couldn't imagine how it would be without HeroesWorld. But now, it seems, he's getting along just fine with the WT chat (maybe I don't know something).

Yeah, yeah, first ask him if he needs HeroesWorld or not.

Haven without Warlock is not Haven.

I repeat. We need to eliminate system errors, not attach polls. Remove the permanent ban forever and give a temporary ban if someone deserves it. It's not right when some program bans players in Heroes 3. Regarding the issue – I am in favor of unbanning.

What's the point? It will be the same as last time – he'll be here for a while, then he'll mess up and get banned again. Here, the situation is different – Valik has problems with his head; his ethical feedback loop isn't working. That is, this behavior isn't the result of some malicious intent, but rather a consequence of his own purely physiological impairment. I think there's a medical term for this. Yes, there are people for whom this evokes sympathy, like doctors who are willing to work with difficult patients. There are also those who find it amusing, giving them an opportunity to release their negativity. But whether such characters are needed on the forum is a debatable question. After all, this isn't a hospice or a reality show, which the forum regularly turns into through the efforts of Valik-like individuals. Personally, I don't mind; I'm quite comfortable playing both the doctor and the troll, and Valik is their favorite client. But if you look at the situation more broadly, at the forum's development over time, then the presence of characters like Valik is a sign of the forum's depressive life cycle stages. In my opinion, it's better not to encourage this trend.

Added 2 minutes later
By the way, why is the poll closed?

before discussing this issue, I think it’s first necessary to have Valentine’s own wish expressed, perhaps through someone else…

I have nothing against Valentin, we always saw eye to eye, but without him it really became cleaner on HeroesWorld and easier to breathe.
And how long will this cordiality of yours last again? I remember the mood was quite different right before the last ban. :)

P.S. And congratulations on the victory, well done!

The problem is that those who vote to unban him do so remotely and, as a rule, do not have any experience interacting with him. There is an extreme form of behavior that Valentin exhibits, and it is 100% expressed in the "bayan" persona. Anyone who is interested in what kind of character this is, is welcome to join the in-game chat; personally, I am disgusted by him and his writings. And wlk777 is an intermediate stage on the path to becoming "bayan" and "bayan-like."

By the way, without an open poll, I think it is somewhat illegitimate.

All Apocalypse Knights should be banned!
I agree with NumVan, it's cleaner on HW without him..
I was rooting for Valentine to be unbanned last time..
But now I'm strongly against it!!!!
We don't need one bad apple ruining a hundred archangels...

Come on, guys! Unban him! He was funny, always arguing with someone – it was entertaining! And his swearing was fine; he used it appropriately.

Terry, chat with wlk and bajan in the in-game chat. You'll have an unforgettable experience. Besides, what's so funny about him constantly using profanity in the game? In real life, he would have already gotten a serious beating for that. If someone treated you badly and cynically in the game, in a mean and cowardly way, taking advantage of the anonymity, would you find it funny and appropriate?

It's unpleasant to interact with people who write things online that they would never say in person. And an anonymous poll is just ridiculous.

If you were treated disgustingly and cynically in the forum, and someone took advantage of their impunity, would you also find it funny and appropriate?

I wouldn't want to dredge up the past, but I can remember my own forum experience (when Forrest was treated rudely a couple of years ago).

"Judge not, that ye be not judged" - something like that...