Posts from FB-3 Auto-translated

...the key word is "satellite"...

Actually, the rules for FB and OFB are practically the same. What's the point of striving for FB if it's not interesting?

The point is to play against strong opponents who have a competitive motivation, and that's obvious.
And the fact that the selection process provides only one and a half (!) places instead of the stated 3 is, of course, very cool. And, judging by the topic, I'm not the only one who finds this surprising.

maybe leaving 3 spots is a bit too few, but 6 is also too many in my opinion; 4-5 is quite enough. There are many tournaments on HeroesWorld and plenty of strong players...
yes, increasing the slots in the FB isn't necessary; 10 is just right, so you don't end up playing it for a year)

My opinion is that if you keep only the top 3-4 places in the Factions Battle (FB), then at the same time, the FB itself should give its participants the opportunity to play in the selection process for the FB. Otherwise, there is an absolute lack of sporting logic and a motivating factor.
Another thing is that the number of participants worthy of participating in the FB is growing with each season, and I don't see any particular problems in increasing the number of participants to 11-12 people. If people really want to and can play in the FB, they will play their games in it; the workload is not that great. I judge by my own example - despite my busy schedule, I managed to play 2-3 games with half of the participants instead of one.
As for the selection process itself, in any case, one place is not enough. At least two finalists, the third depending on the situation. The other "satellites" are not as important as the selection process itself, in my opinion.

Isn't it a bit late? Couldn't we start at least in mid-January? Winter is the best time for Heroes, and there's still a month and a half until February.

It's not possible precisely because we won't have time to finish the Tournaments. There will probably be a short Christmas break in Favorites. The winner will only be determined at the end of January. We'll see how things go.
We need to discuss the rules for Favorites, make/not make changes, think about templates, and, in principle, we can draw the lots earlier and then include the 3 additional participants. Okay, I'll think about it.

And the fact that the selection gives one and a half (!) places instead of the stated 3 is, of course, very cool. And, judging by the topic, I'm not the only one who is surprised by this.

3 places were not stated. It is impossible to state and decide such questions in advance. There is no strict regulation.
At the beginning of August, it was unknown how the Elimination Chamber would end, and there were questions about cheating.
At the beginning of August, it was unknown whether the Favorites tournament would be organized. If Andrey hadn't agreed to run it, I'm not sure I would have taken on the task alone; he handles almost all the organizational work.
At the beginning of August, Favorites-3 had just begun, and it was unknown who would play, how, whether there would be disqualifications and withdrawals.

Let's temporarily suspend the discussion; it's absolutely pointless now, and let's finish the Tournaments.

Regarding expanding to 11, I think I got carried away. Several players from Favorites and organizers wrote to me privately that this is undesirable.

Regarding expanding to 11, I seem to have been too hasty. Several players from Facebook and organizers wrote to me in private messages, saying that this is undesirable.

The motive(s) are very interesting.