Skip to content

Posts from Harry Potter... Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Open
How many books from the Harry Potter series have you read?
36 voters
Single choice Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
#50
Auto-translated
Guys, don't open it, it's a virus!
Yeah, I know, I'm writing from my mobile right now.
User Avatar
#51
Auto-translated
The plot was drastically cut down; Beorn and Tom Bombadil were simply removed, even though both characters are charming and memorable.
A necessary sacrifice to fit the already long film into the allotted screen time, and these characters aren't essential anyway. ha_ha_I_am_tom_bombadil_welcome_to_my_forest_of_faggotry.jpg x)
And the doves were mentioned in the original book; what do additions have to do with it?
Arwen, who has completely different facial features that don't suit elves at all.
I knew something like this would be written as soon as I saw it. But what else could you expect from an inferior race making a film about Noble Elves? They can't even find suitable actors!
a glamorous pretty boy instead of Legolas
Didn't you realize what you were getting into when you started watching a film featuring elves?
Also, I don't know where you saw Armenians.
Anyways, as a film adaptation, it's good, much, much better than Potter, which is why it's a good example.
Also, I don't know any sweet boy who could lead more than one person.
Well, now you do!! It's amazing that you thought Alexander was a stern general all this time. The aforementioned glamorous pretty-boy elf is even "tougher and less pretty" than the Mediterranean boy.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#52
Auto-translated
The necessary sacrifice to fit such a long film into the allotted screen time, and these characters are not essential.
But not to replace them with something that wasn't there.
And there were pigeons in the original book, what do additions have to do with it?
No, I would remember.
Well, what else can you expect from an inferior race making a film about Noble Elves? They won't even find suitable actors!
I'm quite satisfied with Elrond.
Anyways, as an adaptation, it's good, much, much better than Potter, which is why it serves as a good example.
I wouldn't say so, it's roughly the same level of faithfulness to the books.
User Avatar
#53
Auto-translated
Is it because of the beard? Or did the funny translation have such an impact on you?
I wouldn't say so; it's roughly the same level of faithfulness to the books.
I disagree.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#54
Auto-translated
I disagree.
It's your opinion. But you are wrong.
User Avatar
#57
Auto-translated
"Sunny!"
We don't know what he was like, we didn't see him, and we can't claim anything, and what is written in books, drawn in pictures, and sculpted, may not necessarily reflect reality.
Lol, it's silly to repeat my words, as if comparing Stalin and Alexander the Great, didn't you notice that there's a difference of more than 2000 years between them?
Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: [email protected]
User Avatar
#59
Auto-translated
Is it easier this way?
Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: [email protected]
User Avatar
#60
Auto-translated
Goblin-like, in a way.
It just seems that way to you regarding facial features – you see, no one else supports this argument.
That's true. And you are definitely right, as always.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
In reply to Happy Life
User Avatar
#62
Auto-translated
I also think that the Harry Potter movies were poorly made; many of the actors don't match the characters. In The Lord of the Rings, Tolkien didn't burden himself with detailed descriptions of the characters, and everything turned out well – Gandalf is a gray-haired old man who looks like a simple traveler, Aragorn is secretive, strong, and skilled (mostly requiring acting talent), and the hobbits... well, I don't know, they scared me, but at least they had hairy feet (the hobbits are the only mistake; they should have cast actors who were under 50!). And so on.
Пара банок пива, снаряд дешевого пойла
Ракета прущего дыма и море свободы
Серьезные помыслы, прущие скорости, мама с вопросами:
- Куда ты дел совесть? Стань взрослым.
Я в ответ молчал виновато
- Посмотри на брата, разве трудно быть нормальным?
Им не понять меня, не поменять меня
Хотели поломать меня - им не поймать меня
В чем моя вина?
Думал бежать отсюда, хлопал дверями злобно -
Обида-паскуда
Мама била посуду и тихо плакала
Молилась за меня Богу - свечи ставила
In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl
User Avatar
#63
Auto-translated
Sunny!
Guys, don't open it, it's a virus!
That's strange, my Kaspersky Internet Security 2011 didn't detect anything.

Added 6 minutes later
Morning


Well, at least you know now!! Imagine thinking of Alexander as a stern general all this time.
No, I don't.
I've seen many officers in my life, and not a single one with a glamorous, polished look.
2. Aziral, do you seriously believe that 2000 years ago, people who slaughtered their relatives and friends like sheep looked any different than they do today?
Военное дело просто и вполне доступно здравому уму человека. Но воевать сложно.
User Avatar
#64
Auto-translated
Have you ever encountered many Mediterranean officers from antiquity? Back then, for example, homosexuality was not only not condemned but was also actively encouraged.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.
User Avatar
#65
Auto-translated
Aziral, do you seriously believe that 2000 years ago, people who slaughtered their relatives and friends like sheep looked different than they do today?
You misunderstood; I meant that the facts depicting Stalin's appearance are much more convincing than the facts depicting Alexander the Great's appearance.
Небо – мольбы не ждёт
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт

По вопросам модерации: [email protected]
User Avatar
#66
Auto-translated
Morni, why dig so deep? Let's take our prisoners – they also engage in homosexual acts, sodomy is present, but try calling them fags.
I don't know what Alexander the Great's orientation was; I suppose Hephaestion was his lover, but for me, it's obvious that delicate, feminine facial features on a person who fights knee-deep in blood are nonsense. Can you imagine what sword wounds look like? Try cutting and gutting a rabbit – you'll get an approximate idea. Soft facial features mean a soft character; you won't fight much with that.
Военное дело просто и вполне доступно здравому уму человека. Но воевать сложно.