Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The plot was drastically cut down; Beorn and Tom Bombadil were simply removed, even though both characters are charming and memorable.
A necessary sacrifice to fit the already long film into the allotted screen time, and these characters aren't essential anyway. ha_ha_I_am_tom_bombadil_welcome_to_my_forest_of_faggotry.jpg x) And the doves were mentioned in the original book; what do additions have to do with it?
Arwen, who has completely different facial features that don't suit elves at all.
I knew something like this would be written as soon as I saw it. But what else could you expect from an inferior race making a film about Noble Elves? They can't even find suitable actors!
a glamorous pretty boy instead of Legolas
Didn't you realize what you were getting into when you started watching a film featuring elves? Also, I don't know where you saw Armenians. Anyways, as a film adaptation, it's good, much, much better than Potter, which is why it's a good example.
Also, I don't know any sweet boy who could lead more than one person.
Well, now you do!! It's amazing that you thought Alexander was a stern general all this time. The aforementioned glamorous pretty-boy elf is even "tougher and less pretty" than the Mediterranean boy.