Skip to content

Posts from Poll regarding changes to the AK regulations. Auto-translated

Tournament History Closed Topic
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
Accept changes?
35 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
Yes
60% 21 votes
No
40% 14 votes
In reply to ZM
User Avatar
#154
Auto-translated
Zadira
I haven't heard anything about the save time issue yet... so, please enlighten me, comrades... and in general, if there are any other questions that I haven't heard about, feel free to ask, don't hesitate to message me on ICQ...
Here. We were playing at night, saved the game, and when loading the save, I managed to take this screenshot. What are the possible explanations? By the way, they say this isn't the first time you've had this kind of issue with the save time. I'm listening to explanations.
Attachments 1
1 file attached • Total size: 133.9 KB
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to ZM
User Avatar
#155
Auto-translated
So, if we are to believe Valentin, the AK is already voting in full swing, without asking all the questions to the accused? It's interesting to see if the mechanism of work has changed. Or maybe Valentin is confused again. :confused:
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
#156
Auto-translated
Dirty_Player
So, if we are to believe Valentin, the AC is already voting, without asking all the questions to the accused? It's interesting to see if the mechanism has changed. Or maybe Valentin is confused again. :confused:
I didn't say they are voting extensively, but what I said is true. And in cases where the save files speak for themselves, they may not even ask questions.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#157
Auto-translated
Wlk777
I didn't say they were voting all the time, but what I said is true. And in cases where the save files speak for themselves, they might not even ask questions.
Here's an example of a match between Britvotchka and Valenok. For many, the save files spoke for themselves. But for some, they didn't. It's the same here.
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
#158
Auto-translated
Dirty_Player
Here's an example of a match between Britvotchka and Valenok. For many, the replays speak for themselves. But for some, they don't. It's the same here.
The Arbitration Committee consists of competent people; they can decide for themselves whether there are enough replays or if they need to ask the accused. And it's clear that he will deny everything and can come up with explanations for anything if he wants to. I suggest we close the discussion on this matter for now and wait for the Arbitration Committee's decision. I just pointed out that, IN MY OPINION, it's not very appropriate for the organizer to disregard the Arbitration Committee's decision in advance when it doesn't even exist yet.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
User Avatar
#159
Auto-translated
Heh... what day is it even? In response to this nonsense, I have saves that show the opposite; contact me privately if you need them... I have all the save points from when we logged out, and there are only 3 of them; there's nowhere near that much time... that's the first thing.

Secondly, I don't see the point in introducing cheat marks... because firstly, it will be much easier for a player wearing one to register a new account and start over, which means there will be more clones here than originals, and then the hour of reckoning will come, although there are already quite a few of them here, and you have to be blind not to notice the most obvious ones...

And thirdly, if there are going to be cheat marks, let the AK at least figure things out properly before drawing conclusions, otherwise it will be like in Russian prisons, where there are more innocent people than lawbreakers, and then
the AK judges (morally) will be wearing this cheat mark, and not the convicted (materially).

One evil will give rise to another...