Posts from Discussion about the Britvachka-Valenok party.

AK, please vote on the issue of banning Britvochka. This is getting out of hand. I understand if someone was just cheating. But he's a troublemaker. He shifted the blame to Valentok, and now to Vigo. Hey, if you have questions, why were you silent? You could have written about Valentok or Vigo, or whoever else. Now, honestly, it's really annoying. No one accused Valentok of cheating, or even suspected him of it. How does Vigo's carelessness (in a tournament with a prize of 1000 units) relate to this topic? In my opinion, it's just a deflection. Therefore, I ask the AK to vote on banning this person.

Since when does the appeals committee for the third installment of the game decide on account blocking issues? I suggest you open your eyes, wipe the foam from your mouth, and take a look at the current forum guidelines. Firstly, there is no mention of any additional powers for the appeals committee. Secondly, there is no ban for cheating as such, since the forum is not limited to the section for the third game. And thirdly, "squabbles," or rather, flaming, is punishable by a five-point penalty.

To Captain: I apologize, but it's unethical on your part to twist the meaning and bring up how Vigo banned me on Heroes of Might and Magic Online for cheating, using it as an argument. Do you think it's normal to ignore Vigo's questions directed at him? As for Valenka's saves, which I posted screenshots of, I looked at them for the first time the day before yesterday. It would be interesting to see comments from experienced players regarding the logic of the moves I mentioned.

Gentlemen, don't be silly, online broadcasts are not a defense against cheating. The only way to provide complete protection is to have someone stand behind the person. Like a cobra, for example. That's the first thing.
Secondly, Britva actually answers questions directed to him, while Valenok and Vigo just refer to something and don't answer.
And most importantly, will there be a verdict and other decisions?

... Complete protection – only if you put someone behind a person...

- off-topic, but I'll answer – you can simply improve the heroes or write a program that monitors interference with the game. to bRitvo4kA - First, you should have contacted the AC regarding Valenka's cheating, and then write here... and we would have seen how they would sort out ALL THIS :smile17: )))) + probably created a topic too - it was really fun - immediately two flood generators.

I didn't read the whole thread. I found the utopia on the first try. Although, I knew I had to find a "strange" utopia. But I don't think that's very important. I trusted Andrei, and I still trust him 100%. For me, the issue is closed.

I suggest deleting all attacks on Valenok from the thread—because what is being considered here is:

Question: do you believe there was unfair play on the part of bRitvo4kA (Gurni) (in the form of taking Dragon Utopia on 147)?

mods and AK—where are you looking???? Your passive behavior is complicity in spamming!!!
This could lead to a point where everyone is considered a cheater....

Pradromalo, +1 for clarity!
Delete everything except posts related to the question about Pavel Dubrovin! Everything else is spam!

I understand you’re annoyed by my posts? I’ll take the liberty of disagreeing with you.

This topic is called "Discussion of the Britvochka-Valenok game," so everything is on-topic.

I also noticed one detail: the two Dragon Utopias captured in Valenok's screenshots were the last ones on the map, as well as the Chaynik.

As I understand it, my posts are an eyesore to you? I will take the liberty of disagreeing with you.

This topic is called "Discussion of the Britvo4ka-Valenok game," so everything is on-topic.

I also noticed one detail: the two Dragon Utopias captured in Valenok's screenshots were the last ones on the map, as well as a Sorrow.

read the 1st post carefully!!!!
and with all your speculation about Valenok, you are distracting people from discussing your own case. So there!!! AK, open your eyes or learn how to create proper threads

P.S. personally, I don't give a damn about your posts. I would have voted exactly the same way that Valenok cheated, just as I did regarding you — if AK had initiated such a poll (if, of course, your screenshots are truthful)!!

Everyone can verify the authenticity of the screenshots; all save files are posted in the thread from both sides.

Maybe I'm missing something, but the constructive discussion about Andrey's actions ended a couple of days ago. And everyone who wanted to say something has already spoken. IMHO, there are 5 possible solutions. 1) Britva is a cheater, let him burn in hell!!! 2) Britva is as innocent as snow, what idiot decided he's a cheater?! 3) It's not clear here, let everyone decide for themselves. 4) Well, it's kind of unclear, but let's give him the benefit of the doubt, why create a topic for nothing... 5) Well, everything seems suspicious, but there's nothing to punish him for... Everything is somehow slowly moving towards options 4-5, which is not very good. Especially since something is unclear with Valentok.

That sounds a bit paranoid.

I think it's fair to say that there's absolutely no basis for claiming that move 147 is suspicious.

And here is something everyone forgets. If Britva had actually opened the saves, he would have immediately realized that against such a wild number of angels, Nella's Cloak of Renunciation and no other parameters could help; there was little point in him taking that Dragon Utopia, as it didn't save him even remotely. Also, don't forget this point: the more online games a player conducts, the easier it is to find suspicious moments in their parties if one wishes.

Are you actually saying something intelligent for the first time in your life? :)