Posts from Foreign ideals are fleeting and do not deserve to exist. Auto-translated

Patsanchik
meaning: boy, person.

So, patsanchik = boy, person.

Patsanchik, -i, pl. (hooligans, teenagers)

So, patsanchik = hooligan, teenager
Therefore, hooligans, teenagers, boys, people, and patsanchiks are approximately the same?

Yes.

Funny, truly funny)

Added 2 minutes later
I couldn't immediately tell that you don't see the differences so clearly

Called someone a troll – you lost.

I'm not playing the game.
But if we're talking about the meaning, why? This is happening for the third time; at least explain it /:
Otherwise, anyone can just point a finger, write "you're a loser," and avoid the argument that way /:

Added 1 minute ago

Calling someone a troll means you've lost.

I very rarely insult anyone (except in casual conversations with friends and with myself). If I call someone something, it means I genuinely think of them that way. (although I often call myself names, but not insult myself :))

What does "толсто" mean? Kid, boy, bill, vasya, guy, dude – they are all approximately the same.

I already answered.

I didn't see it. Quote it. I mean the definition, not your personal example about two classmates.

Kid, boy, dude, Vasya, guy, fellow – they all mean roughly the same thing.

There was also a "gopnik" among them, and that's a completely different story.
Go with VisTrit.
"A group that doesn't think and behaves immorally, only for its own benefit."
Something like that.
There are five classmates there, 4 or 5, well, never mind.

Probably one of them is a person with disabilities. It's very mean of you to talk about him behind his back.

Just in case, I tell him everything straight to his face: 0.5 is a person who is extremely dependent on the opinions of others; he's always switching sides, sometimes with one group, sometimes against them, but for the last two years, he's been completely aligned with them.

Why use the Wistrit definition? Don't you have your own opinion?

By the way, if a "пацанчик" equals a person, a guy, etc., then who is this mythical "пацан" who is so easily defeating the kitchen philosopher-intellectual? Is he some kind of special individual?

Read more carefully. There wasn't an "=". It said "approximately the same." Because they are all people. And the boy is no worse than the guy, no matter what you say. And what goes beyond the approximate is what distinguishes them.
You get a failing grade in geometry because each angle needs to be labeled with a letter, and if you label them all, it will be some kind of surreal hexagon.

I would say it's an infinite-sided polygon, as we can take any number of points on its sides and say that each is a vertex of its unfolded angle.

A geometric figure is a triangle. Then the "kitchen theorist" is also just a guy. But you singled out this "guy" into some separate group, different from the "kitchen theorists."

A geometric figure is a triangle.

Uh, no, colleague, you are fundamentally wrong, because

A triangle is the simplest polygon; a part of a plane bounded by three points and three line segments, each connecting two of these points.

Your image shows 6 vertices.