Posts from Foreign ideals are fleeting and do not deserve to exist. Auto-translated

Oh shi~

Imaris, you've really intrigued me. Could you, in the name of science and progress, draw a triangle with a number of angles different from three?

Another one
Well, come on, can you at least, even if just for a split second, get rid of what's been firmly stuck in your head for many years and suggest something else, something alternative, even if it's absurd? Why are you all so rigid in your thinking?)

Added 1 minute ago
I certainly won't draw it, but I don't rule out the possibility that it's possible, even if it can't be proven by your science. Anything is possible.

Of course, we can, just help us, open our eyes to this alternative! Open Paint and reveal what's hidden.

Heh, they don't seem to be opening for you)

Added 1 minute ago
Amko, your eyes won't open until you want them to. No one will understand anything until they want to understand it themselves ;)

What worn-out and arrogant speeches.

Okay, okay, don't read, I understand everything.

?
Unless it's about Russian rock?

Even if it were only about Russian rock, it wouldn't change the essence.
However, it's not just about that; any real person's judgment and point of view is based on those two arguments.

Regarding the question of triangles with >3 angles: Have you seen a hypercube? It's interesting.

He is quite handsome, by the way.

Wolf, you described a typical school bully. If you call him a thug, then you'll have to call everyone a thug. Yes, including you. And if you think that's fair, then your accusations of them being thugs don't make sense. That's how a kid can catch a wannabe philosopher in a logical fallacy. A couple more times (triangle), and the conversation can be considered pointless. The philosopher backed down. The kid won. A hundred points advantage didn't help.
So, don't think of them as stupid. Stereotypes are one thing, but real people are another. Right, Wissy? Have you talked to many of them to make such a categorical and youthful maximalist statement?

Wolf, you described a typical school bully.

This is just a typical school thug.

Wolf, you described a typical school bully. If you call him a thug, then you'll have to call everyone a thug. Yes, including you.

I don't do any of the things I listed there. And "everyone" doesn't do them either. Your conclusion comes from nowhere.

A couple more times (triangle), and the conversation can be considered pointless.

I consider it pointless from the very beginning.

So, you shouldn't think of them as idiots.

The thugs you described aren't idiots, but the thugs I described are idiots (with the exception, I repeat, of one brain-dead individual).
P.S. You are illogical and inconsistent.

I don't do any of the things I listed there. And "everyone" doesn't do them either. Your conclusion comes from nowhere.

Oh no. It does come from somewhere. I said – you described a typical school bully. Completely average. That's how all school bullies act. If you call the first person you see who acts "normally" a "redneck" (surprise!), then you're all rednecks. Some are typical bullies, some are typical nerds, some are typical geeks. And they're all rednecks because they're all typical and don't stand out from thousands of other people like them. Because "redneck" isn't "a bad person." It's livestock.

Well, if you can't see the difference between a boor and a normal person, I have some rather unpleasant news for you.

define "boor"
define "normal person"

This is where any argument should begin.

He probably sees rednecks in everyone.
Amko, do you see rednecks in practically every person?

First, give me a definition of what "быдло" is and what a normal person is.

I won't give you any definitions; use your own.