Skip to content

Posts from Forum

1.0 (1 rating)
In reply to Van
User Avatar
#924
Auto-translated
Van
Did you serve in the army, kid?
You won't believe it, uncle :)
bRitvo4kA
If you're talking about dictatorship and one-man judging, then there's a much higher chance of corruption in judging.
What corruption are you talking about, dear?

A judge is a very vulnerable figure; if they get involved in something like that, players will simply stop signing up for Tournaments, and at best, they'll all leave the current one immediately.
Besides, in this case, to embody the principle of "the law is the same for everyone," the judge must have a strong character; otherwise, even if they catch someone cheating, they won't be able to penalize them.
That's why, in order to develop such a character, they need to be independent, to learn everything on their own, through trial and error.

Remember Vitalik's case; Neo initially had a very weak position – he was not only the judge but also the injured party, Vitalik's opponent in the final. That's where there was plenty of room for gossip and speculation with almost any decision.

However, he handled the situation with dignity. I'm even afraid to imagine what the Arbitration Committee would have done... Vitalik had a very strong support group, and the situation was also not 100% clear.
In reply to Kash
User Avatar
#925
Auto-translated
Kash
I, for example, wouldn't make a decision about the Clash of Heroes tournament alone.

In the end, the decision was made to withdraw from the tournament, and this is entirely within the competence of the host. :)
If you haven't gotten tired yet, continue to criticize the system. It hasn't even been properly tested yet; it needs to be tested and refined, but you...

That's what I'm saying, the system is imperfect, and an AK (Administration Committee) isn't needed. ;) But I'm always ready to help discuss something. ;)
Школа начального мастерства по Вторым Героям.

http://offtop.ru/heroes2school/
In reply to Kash
User Avatar
#926
Auto-translated
Kash
Pash, stop arguing like that, it's not working for you. You're a tight player, they're aggressive. Your strength lies in AA, KK, and AK :cool:
Man, I can't help but make fun of you guys.
Enough already. It's like a kindergarten, honestly.
It's a scary sight when two super-aggressive regulars at high stakes start pressuring each other. In their aggressive state, they sometimes make such terrible plays that people who come to watch, for example, a NL400 game, see hands like K8 vs. A5 for 200 big blinds between two super-strong players and think, "Nah, I don't need this at these limits; I'll quietly play my NL25." So, let's refrain from large pots and super-loose 4-bets; it's just too swingy ;)

This is just a continuation of the poker topic...

"Это нам идеально подходит!" [Новосибирск, 2013]
"Красавчик! Если только не читер.." [Киев, 2014]
"Это Вам не шутки - нажрался Dust в маршрутке" [Новокузнецк, 2015]
Сам ты фиш (с) :D
In reply to LeBron
User Avatar
#927
Auto-translated
How about we pit Ketch and Vik against each other and watch them battle with D3 and G2? :smile04:
In reply to Kash
User Avatar
#928
Auto-translated
Kash
How about we pit Ketch and Vik against each other and watch them battle with D3 and G2? :smile04:

Your "pit them against each other" skills haven't improved much :D
Школа начального мастерства по Вторым Героям.

http://offtop.ru/heroes2school/
In reply to Catch
User Avatar
#929
Auto-translated
Catch
Your "natravlyalka" hasn't grown :D
Ugh, comparing "natravlyalkas" again... It's the same thing every day.
User Avatar
#930
Auto-translated
I am not afraid to take responsibility, but I want the decision to be well-considered, correct, and qualified, which is why the Arbitration Committee (AC) was handling this situation. If there were no AC, I would have made the decision myself, of course.
One mind is good, but two are better.

...let's take a look at something we will never know, but with common sense, we can assume. Let's say Alex's case was not referred to the AC, and the judge, within reasonable limits, made a certain decision (the AC's decision would be one of the possible outcomes), and some users would not like it. What would happen then? Ask yourselves, esteemed disgruntled users.

Moreover, because of two or more players, the established AC organization could not have stopped its work and the authority to make decisions, because it was created for these purposes.
:smile17:
In reply to General ZeT
User Avatar
#931
Auto-translated
General ZeT
...
Especially considering two or more players, the officially established AK organization could not halt its operations and the authority to make decisions, as it was created for these purposes...
There are not just one or two players. The rest simply gave up on it.
User Avatar
#932
Auto-translated
Regardless, AlexazeGreat was accused not by his opponent, but by a third party (the player on the left). Is this acceptable?
I've been struggling with the rule for weeks: who can file a complaint about unfair play?
The opponent, or anyone who simply didn't like certain actions?
I'm asking you, or are we just going to keep joking around?
Ушел с героев, пока пряники)
In reply to SEM_56
User Avatar
#933
Auto-translated
SEM_56
Regardless, AlexazeGreat was accused not by his opponent, but by a third party (the player on the left). Is this permissible?
I've been struggling with the rule for weeks: who can file a complaint about unfair play?
The opponent, or anyone who simply didn't like certain actions?
And I'm asking you, or are we just going to keep joking around, comrades?


According to the current AK Regulations:

2. Any user of HW (not necessarily a participant in the game) can also raise suspicions of cheating in the AK (against any of its members) if the match/matches were played on any other resource in any online HOMM3 tournament between HOMM3 players registered on HW.
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
In reply to General ZeT
User Avatar
#934
Auto-translated
Kash
Damn, they're comparing each other's "attack dogs" again... What is it with them, it's the same thing every day.

Don't worry, Victor! As is usually the case in such situations: two people will organize a protest, shout in the square, release negative energy, and then they will disperse without achieving anything. You'll see. :)

P.S. I don't think the posts should be deleted, as they serve for social identification of users + free lectures on political science, sociology, psychology, and group dynamics may still be useful to many before the inevitable May exam session. As they say: every cloud has a silver lining. So don't miss the continuation of the lecture today: chapter IV "conspiracy theory". It will be interesting. :)
Человек человеку - друг!
In reply to Дубровин Павел
User Avatar
#935
Auto-translated
Pavel Dubrovin
According to the current AC Regulations:

2. Also, any HeroesWorld user (not necessarily a game participant) may approach any AC member with suspicions of cheating in the AC, provided that the game/games were played on any other resource in any online HOMM3 tournament between HOMM3 players registered on HeroesWorld.

Okay Pasha, the penny has dropped!!!
Now tell me, can anyone file a complaint if a player, having caught their opponent cheating, has no objections despite seeing it???!!!!:smile12:

Added after 1 minute
Erdem
Don't worry, Victor! As usual in such situations: 2 people organize a protest, shout in the square, vent negative energy, and then leave empty-handed themselves. You'll see. :)

P.S. IMO, posts shouldn't be deleted for social identification of users + free lectures on political science, sociology, psychology, and TLP might still come in handy for many before the inevitably approaching May exam session. As they say: every cloud has a silver lining. So don't miss today's continuation of the lecture: Chapter IV "conspiracy theory". It will be interesting. :)

Did you even understand what he said???)))
Ушел с героев, пока пряники)
In reply to SEM_56
User Avatar
#936
Auto-translated
SEM_56
Alright Pasha, the message finally got through to you!!!
Now tell me, can anyone file a complaint if a rival, having caught the opponent cheating, doesn't have any objections???!!!!:smile12:



Roma, if we follow the current rules of the Arbitration Committee (AK), then any user of the World of Xen (WoX) platform, even if they are not a participant in the disputed game,
can contact the AK with a request to review the game of its participants (registered on WoX).
С истиной где-то рядом...





Лето 2010.
In reply to Дубровин Павел
User Avatar
#937
Auto-translated
Dubrovin Pavel
Roma, if we are guided by the current AC rules, then any user of Vold, even if not a participant in the disputed game,
can contact the AC with a request to review the game of its participants (registered on Vold).

Bayevs registered on HeroesWorld, tremble!!!:smile10: The AC is coming for you! :smile24:
Школа начального мастерства по Вторым Героям.

http://offtop.ru/heroes2school/