Posts from Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Unfortunately, I only played one game in the previous season. So, +0 for the current Academy lineup!

Leave as is.

When will the automated player rating be implemented?

Definitely leave it as is!

In general, I suggest leaving them alone instead of chewing over some dubious complaints. The court has decided — THAT'S IT, the judge is always right, no discussion! Otherwise, there will be chaos, because there will always be dissatisfied people.

So, dear AK should focus on more useful things for HeroesWorld instead of wasting their time on various soap-opera squabbles.

Dirty_Player
LeBron
scorp
vbn

I would definitely keep these guys. I've gotten used to listening to them, and I respect their opinions. Their worldview doesn't contradict mine. I'm always ready to believe them and carry out any task. In short, they are an unquestionable authority for me. Maybe I wrote it too strongly and it sounds awkward, but it's sincere. :)
Why didn't I include Pete and Pasha here? In short, they seem too bureaucratic and too "correct" for our "gaming" authority. Secondly, they are involved in a lot of organizational activities, which is more like the work of the Operations Department, isn't it? Plus, moderation, ratings, where else can they upload saves? And finally, I didn't really like the AK's decision and how it was announced, sorry for the negative comment. It all boils down to one thing.
I'm practically not familiar with Mizrael, so I'm not sure, I won't include him.

I went through the list of nicknames in my memory and decided that the most adequate, competent, and unbiased are: Vikk, Zhavdet, and Decon. These are just options, in case there is a shortage of members.

It's all just my opinion. I wrote what I thought, I won't argue about it, I don't need to prove anything to me, and it's pointless to try to convince me. :)

When will there be an automated ranking for deputies?

Money from the budget was spent on AK-style corporate events:smile32: So, sorry:p

Excellent AK, I don't see any reason to change anything... and change it to what?

+1 :smile01:

LeBron
DirtyPlayer
Pit for LM
Mizrael
scorp
That's my vote. I didn't quite grasp the reasons for the mandatory inclusion of 5 games. If it's specifically about the spring 2010 season, then my vote doesn't carry much weight.
Thank you.

Added 3 minutes later
You could add Javdet and Cash. I'm not sure if the guys would agree.

money from the budget was spent on AK-style corporate events:smile32:
so, sorry:p

Return the money, punish the corrupt officials :D

well, you know! being a people's deputy is no easy task!!! there's deciding here, voting there, so you can't do without trips to Egypt and the Bahamas.

well, you know! being a people's deputy is not an easy task!!! there's deciding here, voting there, so you can't do without trips to Egypt and the Bahamas

Are you, by any chance, related to Yuri Venediktovich?

I didn't quite grasp the reasons for the mandatory requirement of 5 games. If it's specifically related to the spring 2010 season, then my opinion doesn't carry much weight.
Thank you.

This is a draft of the Election Regulations, not the final version. If you have any suggestions regarding the procedure, please submit them; they will be discussed and evaluated collectively by all Heroes players.

Regarding the requirement of 5 games – perhaps a different mechanism is needed, but I haven't found any other way to prevent those who don't consider Vold their primary resource from being elected to the Administrative Council.

For those who specialize in offline play, this requirement should not apply, I believe. For such Heroes players, the selection criteria could be, for example, participation in 1-2 offline tournaments on Vold per season.

I would like to ask the Heroes community to share their comments and suggestions regarding the elections to the AC.

I believe that Pit, Pavel, LeBron, and Mizrael should remain. The others (Scorp, Vbn, Dirty Player) should be removed :).
Reason: I believe it is wrong to disqualify Alex from the tournament and at the same time not give him a Champion of Champions title. We need to be consistent. Either Alex is a cheater and should be given the Champion of Champions title (as Pit and Pavel believe), or Alex is innocent and should not be disqualified from the tournament (as Mizrael and LeBron believe). Instead of them, there are many other candidates.
I will try to name three: Vik, Spirit, Cash.

Everyone should be removed! Just kidding :) (although there is some truth in every joke! :) ) .. I don't have a voice :( I'm not playing at all...

Also, I believe it would be right not to impose a barrier in the form of a certain number of games for those who were members of the Interportal Team of Volde.

Added 3 minutes later
Today, the Draft Regulations for the Elections to the Appeals Committee are proposed for discussion in the following form:

Regulations for the Elections of the Appeals Committee of HeroesWorld

1. The Appeals Committee is elected for 1 year. 2. The date of the Appeals Committee elections is May 1 (tentatively), 2010. 3. Every player has the right to participate in the voting for the election of the Appeals Committee: - who has played at least 5 games (confirmed by reports) on HeroesWorld in the season preceding the Appeals Committee elections, or - who participated in 1-2 offline tournaments on Volde in the season preceding the Appeals Committee elections, or - who is, or was, a member of the Interportal Team of Volde. 4. A player participating in the voting indicates 7 players whom he would like to see in the Appeals Committee in the corresponding topic created for voting. 5. A player participating in the voting does not have the right to vote for himself. 6. As a result of the elections, 7 players are selected for the Appeals Committee by a simple majority of votes. 7. A second round of elections is held in case of a tie in votes and the absence of vacant positions in the Appeals Committee. For example, the seventh and eighth players on the list received the same number of votes, so only these players participate in the second round. In the second round, the player(s) who received a simple majority of votes are selected for the Appeals Committee. 8. A player with an active ban does not have the right to participate in the voting.