Please advise... the rules state: The game continues until one of the players surrenders or loses.
It also states that if a stalemate situation arises, one player must attack their opponent no later than the end of the 3rd game month (3-4-7)!
I have a question: what if the situation is not a stalemate... but for some reason, they don't meet by the deadline (3-4-7)... can the game continue, or what should be done? (We are currently at the end of the 2nd month, I'm just clarifying for future reference).
Posts from The Great Confrontation
Attention! The templates for IRMG have been updated, please download the new versions. The changes affected the starting zones; now, small and empty ones will be very rare. The generator has also been updated to version 1.29.
I have a question: what if the situation isn't a stalemate, but for some reason, the players still haven't met by the deadline (3-4-7)? Can the game continue, or what should be done? (We're currently at the end of the second month, I'm just clarifying for future reference).
First, you need to explain to the judges why one of the players (who was against a draw) didn't attack his opponent by the end of turns 3-4-7. Answers like "I couldn't find him" won't work. On the largest and most complex map, it's quite possible to find the opponent's castle and attack it multiple times, so read the rules carefully.
1st "game deadlines" - 1 game per week - we can manage!
2nd - a stalemate is when both opponents don't want to engage in battle on the opponent's terms (quoted from the rules)
and 3rd the most important thing: we want to engage in battle (no longer related to point 2) let's say a little later - it's fun to strategize and plan the attack!!!!!!!
There's nothing about this in the rules - draw your own conclusions
PS - I'm saying this again, this situation hasn't happened yet, just explain what the problem is.
I'm reading the rules and I see -
1st "game deadlines" - 1 game per week - we can manage that!
2nd - a stalemate is when both opponents don't want to engage in battle on the opponent's terms (removed from the rules)
and 3rd the most important thing is we want to engage in battle (no longer related to point 2) let's say a little later - it's fun to strategize!!!!!!!
there's nothing about this in the rules - draw your own conclusions
PS - I'm saying this again, there isn't such a situation yet, just explain what the problems are.
PS - I repeat, there are no such situations yet, just explain what the problems are.
I registered after everyone else, meaning I waited for some time for my application to be reviewed. And when people from the group started adding me on ICQ, I completely forgot that I was waiting for someone new and the first person who added me, I automatically put on ignore (because I often get a lot of spam). I don't remember who it was... Guys, if you tried to contact me, please write on the forum with your username, I'll find you in my private list and remove you from ignore.
I apologize – maybe I’m wrong – but if the skill level of the last applicant (Denis96) is the same as in his application, is there any point? You need to practice killing – for example, I scored over 5000 points on killing – and then registered for a tournament)) like I did back in the day.
Guys, doesn't anyone think that 8 minutes per turn is a bit too short?..
So, if you add another 2 minutes, the turn could last 20-30 minutes, or even longer...
Guys, doesn't anyone think that 8 minutes per turn is a bit too short?..
Try asking the same question on the Ubisoft forums; they'll tear you apart right away :D. For Ubisoft players, 5 minutes is an eternity. But seriously, the 8-minute time limit wasn't just pulled out of thin air. This issue has been discussed before, and 8 minutes is currently the most optimal time for a turn. Ad already outlined some of the factors that were considered when choosing the time in his post. But there's also the concept of mutual agreement; in principle, players can jointly decide on a turn time, whether it's 1 minute or 20, and this is not prohibited. However, 8 minutes remains the standard.
Well, I don't know... I don't really like playing on Ubisoft; I prefer Hamachi. But it's true that 5 minutes is too long! I really lose control when a game that's supposed to take a week drags on for an hour or two; it's torture for me :( :( :(
I'm already used to 3-4 minutes... in reality, some players are just slow, reading all sorts of nonsense, or chatting on ICQ, or going to eat, or leaving for some other reason, delaying their turn... it's ridiculous.
This is just my personal opinion; I'm not imposing it on anyone... I'm just expressing what's been bothering me