Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Mafia: general discussions.Auto-translated
Mafki could have immediately said on the first day that I was lying or something like that. If the rule hadn't restricted them, Seever would have hinted that he was an expert and said I was lying. That's it. There are many ways out of such situations. ;) Besides, I mentioned in a post below that it could also be interpreted as: "I'm an expert," "I'm a pastry chef," "I see a real expert/pastry chef in this topic." So, there's nothing to complain about. Everything was ambiguous here.
Если кто-то тебе противоречит, подумай: может, он не прав? (с)
Говорят, что рыжие не плачут, Говорят, душа у них - огонь. Если влюблены, то любят значит, Если ненавидят - их не тронь!
"Не заблуждайтесь. Рыжие - это зло! Знаете кто был рыжим? Иуда... Что сделал Иуда? Иисуса предал - вот что! Я говорю вслух то, о чем другие только думают. Рыжие опасны. И однажды ночью, когда вы будете спать в своих кроватках, рыжие придут за вами... Они придут за вами!!!" (с) Эрик Картман
Attention! It is strictly forbidden to post in this thread, including deleted posts. If you have any questions or suggestions, please contact me via ICQ/private message.
This thread is created solely for the convenience of players. For now, it only contains a table of upcoming games; statistics and a set of rules will be added soon.
Anyone who has ready-made settings, good ideas, or at least a desire to become a GM, please contact me.
Try it yourself. There is a difference, and a significant one. Here, there will be a choice – to believe or not, and that's better than having no choice at all.
Anyway, I won't insist: those who are interested can try playing a game where I will be the GM.
So, for the next game, I propose we use the reformulated rules I suggested regarding role revelation. Let's see in practice what comes of it, and then we'll decide based on the circumstances. A little later, Wedma will run a Mafia game in his own style – let's see that version too. Everything is learned through comparison.
Added 16 minutes ago Wesker
* Let's scrap the rule about the "mandatory vote within twelve hours." It's not needed by anyone... and you understand that yourself.
As I see, everyone is against this rule. If no one objects within 24 hours, it will be permanently removed. Wesker
* Role revelation. As Zubr said, Mafia is not just about solving clues (literally ;)). In other words, simply guessing clues is boring and uninteresting. What's much more important is the game itself from an intuitive point of view. That is, a "eloquent" Mafia member or serial killer will use all available means to make people follow him, to listen to him. This opens up new possibilities, new options. Because it's more interesting than just searching through wikis and seeing what this or that word in the newspaper means.
The ban on role revelation does not destroy the psychological aspect of the game – it forces people to act more cleverly. I am personally strongly against role revelations and obvious hints – only subtle and isolated ones. Wesker
* The day should end as soon as the required number of votes is reached. Again, this expands the tactical side of the game. And I think it would be unfair if the Mafia carries out an excellent "setup" operation, everyone votes, and then someone comes along and ruins everything.
I'm even a little happy that there are disagreements on this point. And both sides are right in some ways.
By the way, I'm putting up for discussion the eternal inviolability of the day and night limits – perhaps, give the GM the ability to locally change them depending on the situation? Wesker
* I am strongly against a blacklist. I remind you that everyone on the forum is "one of us," and this is completely unnecessary here. I would not want to see my friends, or God forbid :smile04: in some list of violators (also, you could think that rules are constantly being broken and there's complete chaos:smile04:)
Okay, a blacklist is not an option. But a method against offline players is still needed.
There was a fleeting idea – in the morning of days 2, 4, and 6, the GM would publish a list of those living players who have less than 5, 10, and 15 posts in the thread, respectively. If they do not reach the required number of posts during the game day, they will be modkilled. Of course, excluding cases where a player really cannot be online and warns the GM.
Наше оружие - неожиданность! Неожиданность и страх, страх и неожиданность - это два наших оружия! Плюс безжалостность - три наших оружия: страх, неожиданность и безжалостность! И ещё фанатичная преданность Папе - четвёртое! Наше оружие включает в себя... наше оружие включает в себя... страх, неожиданность... я сейчас!
There was a fleeting idea – in the morning of days 2, 4, and 6, the GM would release a list of live players who have less than 5, 10, and 15 posts in the thread, respectively. If they don't reach the required number of posts during the game day, they will be mod-killed. Of course, this excludes cases where a player genuinely cannot be online and warns the GM.
I don't know... I think it's possible to write one message per day, but in it, reveal everything you want to say...
I think it's better if they don't write anything for 2 nights – mod-kill.
I think it's better if nothing is posted for 2 nights - modkill
Nothing is posted at night anyway; you clearly meant days. Look at the entire discussion, not just the last message – it didn't help at 12 either.
Наше оружие - неожиданность! Неожиданность и страх, страх и неожиданность - это два наших оружия! Плюс безжалостность - три наших оружия: страх, неожиданность и безжалостность! И ещё фанатичная преданность Папе - четвёртое! Наше оружие включает в себя... наше оружие включает в себя... страх, неожиданность... я сейчас!
Okay, so – gameplay day and night offline without notifying the GM – mod kill.
And also. I will no longer ask players for non-disclosure agreements, and I advise other GMs to do the same. If they don't send them, it will be worse for them.
Наше оружие - неожиданность! Неожиданность и страх, страх и неожиданность - это два наших оружия! Плюс безжалостность - три наших оружия: страх, неожиданность и безжалостность! И ещё фанатичная преданность Папе - четвёртое! Наше оружие включает в себя... наше оружие включает в себя... страх, неожиданность... я сейчас!
by the way, many GMs have told me about this)) it's crazy, they sign up, and then just sit and wait to be asked for a non-disclosure agreement... is it really that hard to write two words? I doubt people are so busy that they don't have a minute of free time (especially students), and you can decide on the target during the day P.S. but in the last Mafia game, everything was fast (faster than usual), and I liked it.
For now, nominations are based solely on statistics. If you're willing to thoroughly review all the forums and carefully read each post, then go ahead!
Наше оружие - неожиданность! Неожиданность и страх, страх и неожиданность - это два наших оружия! Плюс безжалостность - три наших оружия: страх, неожиданность и безжалостность! И ещё фанатичная преданность Папе - четвёртое! Наше оружие включает в себя... наше оружие включает в себя... страх, неожиданность... я сейчас!