Posts from "Heroes 5". But are they really "Heroes"?

The balance lies in the fact that, with skillful play, you can defeat superior forces without suffering any losses!

The balance lies in being able to defeat superior forces without losses through skillful gameplay!

This isn't balance; it's tactical skill.

That’s impossible in the 5th game! But the 3rd game still has a better atmosphere!

That’s just not possible in Heroes 5! But still, Heroes 3 has a better atmosphere!

How is it impossible??? You’re just not very good at the game... and as for the atmosphere, that’s just your opinion (IMHO), in my opinion, I haven’t seen any decent campaigns since Heroes 2.

That's just not possible in the 5th game! But the 3rd game still has a better atmosphere!

Play the campaign on expert difficulty, and then we can talk.
But on regular maps, the AI is really bad!

Added 1 minute ago
I'm all for more campaigns, let them make more.

Campaign??? The game is only good because of the scripts and initial conditions that favor the player... As always, though!

I hope Ubisoft will improve the AI.

Otherwise, as the difficulty increases, it becomes more challenging because there are fewer resources and the monsters are tougher, but the AI doesn't improve!

It seems like we're getting off-topic. Based on what criteria can the fifth installment be considered (or not considered) a "Heroes" game? In general, I would highlight the following:
1 - Universe (new, underdeveloped, partially plagiarized)
2 - Gameplay (improved, without radical changes)
3 - Plot (plagiarism from Warcraft 3)
4 - Atmosphere (a lot of embellishments, but all of it is superficial).
Based on these parameters, the fifth installment is not "Heroes," but rather a game with "heroic" gameplay.

There’s nothing left to play anyway. Or are you planning to play Heroes of Might and Magic III for another five years?

2 AlexeyPank
1. The universe never really interested me much (or maybe I just didn't have internet access to read about it), and I can play perfectly fine without it.
2. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? The radical changes in the 4th installment largely ruined it for many people. Now, some don't like the introduction of initiative, but I think it's fine, and it's a matter of personal preference.
3. Perhaps this will be a secret to you, but all the storylines were conceived about 3000 years ago and have only been repeated since then, changing the setting. And yet, where you saw Warcraft 3, remains a mystery to me.
4. I am very pleased with the atmosphere in the castles, in the campaigns, and in the game in

There's nothing else to play anyway. Or are you going to keep playing Heroes 3 for another five years?

I could play it for ten, what's wrong with that? I personally prefer playing old games over new ones!

Added after 59 seconds
And if the next installment is completely terrible, will you still play it?

I'll switch to Disciples, although it will be hard to part with the Heroes.

Why switch? You can combine Disciples with the old Heroes!
That's what I'm doing right now!

Why not? I still play Heroes of Might and Magic III and it’s perfectly fine!