Posts from Mafia: general discussions. Auto-translated

What does "and that" mean?

well, it seems they didn't get much satisfaction from killing you)))

P.S. Liz, was it really only once? Considering you were a Mafia member 5-6 times? =\ Although, in the second game, you were the advocate, and in the seventh, you also couldn't kill...

Arandor, by the way, tried to kill me twice. And both times it failed :p One time, I even saved myself on the first day.

Revan, never mind, maybe I'll get lucky someday))) but I indirectly killed you in Mafia 7 when I messed up your assassination :P

Days last as long as needed, until a decision is made regarding the execution of a specific player, with a maximum duration of 24 hours.

A day lasts exactly 24 hours. In extremely rare cases, a day may end earlier or later.

Since when did we make such a drastic shift to the second option?

Following the second option, the need for a "No Night Vote" (NNV) will disappear altogether. Consequently, we lose an important gameplay element.

What was the reason for changing the rule? If there is no NNV or "quick elimination," the day will still last 24 hours.

Perhaps we should decide?

What's the next Mafia game – who will host it, and when?
Does anyone have ready-made scenarios or are they in the process of preparing one?

I'll participate in a couple, and then I want to come up with something new and host it myself.

if anyone is interested, it would be best to do it no earlier than the 20th, when my studies are over :) ...or the 19th =/ I already forgot.

You can skip one, and nothing bad will happen.

Since the thread about the last Mafia game was closed, I have to post here!

Not exactly...
Well, I admit, I realized that Hermit was going to be eliminated... And there was a chance that it would be Kyle - so why kill him, he's going to die anyway... It was a gambit, if you understand. It took a lot of effort to send someone to kill Hermit, but it was all done with mutual consent. It seems it worked - we killed two Mafia members with one blow. Then I really made a mistake when I suggested out loud that Kyle was a Demonologist. Unfortunately, the evidence didn't seem convincing to the town.

Kash! First of all, you didn't convince me at all, and I agreed to commit a night kill against Arandor just to avoid continuing this pointless argument. Secondly, my role within the Mafia was apparently more important than yours, and that's why you should have been the one to eliminate him!
When you were trying to convince me that you would be killed tonight, but nothing would happen to me, and that we should vote against Arandor, not Kyle, I thought you were being sincere with me. No tactic, and this is definitely not the best one, can justify the immorality of your actions!!! Even if you thought it was the best option, and it wasn't, you should have told me about it! I was your comrade, how could you use me???!!! And without my consent, you had no moral right to do that, even if you think I'm a fool!!! Okay, Kash, be happy, you managed to use me this time, but not because you convinced me that Arandor would try to kill you, and Kyle would be checking someone's status, but because I didn't believe you were capable of such a thing! I simply didn't allow myself to think that, even though the thought was there... But if we ever play in the same Mafia again and have an equal role, I won't even ask for your opinion - I'll just send my night kill request to the GM, and then he can decide by drawing lots or something else, and you won't be able to pull this trick on me again. Look for other pawns!

Hermit, you're wrong. The decision of who to eliminate is initially reached by the group. It's just that often someone makes a suggestion, which others support. And also, there's an unspoken rule (the GM answered the Mafia this way) - the head of the Mafia has the final say.
And regarding who goes to kill - the situation is the same. Either collectively, or someone volunteers. There's no order. Your candidacy was apparently suggested because you hadn't killed anyone yet - you were given a chance to try. It was something like that.

And you, Zybr, are right, but the problem is that a group where someone treats someone else as a pawn is no longer a group! Therefore, when I play in the same Mafia with Kash, I will do as I said!
P. S. And this tactic is far from the best. It's better to guarantee killing one Mafia member with one shot, i.e., Kyle, without losing your own, than to do it this way.

Oh, well :) Perhaps I was wrong.
And why didn't you listen to me when I asked you not to reveal yourself and to sacrifice Zubr, who couldn't be saved? You put yourself and the whole operation at risk. If that hadn't happened, I would have been the one doing the killing, of course. I rarely miss an opportunity to take someone down.

However, I'll answer in more detail in a private message.

P.S. I apologize if I offended you in any way.

I wasn't giving myself away any more than you were. Besides Kyle, no one suspected me more than you. Not even Arandor or the Sorceress. And even he probably didn't have complete certainty, just a suspicion, just like Revan had about you.

Well, to be honest, we suspected you even before you were exposed (and not just Kyle, believe me, maybe I even pushed for it more), and after Zubr was executed, the suspicions were confirmed, and that was it.

A request for whoever will be hosting the next Mafia game: please make only one Mafia group, as they are actively destroying each other... and three Mafia games in a row with two groups each is too much. An idea has emerged to host a Mafia game with a New Year's theme. **Is it worth doing, and if so, when would be the best time – before, after, or during the holidays?**

I'm going to run the next game. I've already developed the concept and roles. There's one mafia group and some maniacs, so I think it will be fine. Is anyone against me running it?

Great! I really want a "by Wedma!" themed Mafia game. :)