HeroesWorld
  • Log in
  • Create account
  • Mode
    Interface scale

Posts from - What are the drawbacks of Heroes 3? (What didn't you like about it?)

General
No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
In reply to Мститель
User Avatar
Offline Wlk777
Registered:
Posts: 2,544
#370
Auto-translated
Avenger
1. Apparently, you didn't read my message carefully, as there was no suggestion to play with only one hero. The criticism was about the lack of increased income when purchasing a new hero.

2. The ability to use all resources (even at the first levels) is a sign of skill (I'm talking about using 5 heroes).
This is completely different from playing with only archangels.
1. All the strong players I know hire many heroes; in my successful games, the problem of a shortage of the 8-hero limit appears quite quickly. The desire to limit the number of heroes clearly indicates the level of play, just like...
2. It is precisely the use of what you called "first-level resources" in the early days of online games that mainly determines the outcome of the game, for your information. I am becoming more and more convinced that you know very little about 3 heroes and probably can't play them properly.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Lider1
User Avatar
Offline LeBron
Registered:
Posts: 1,453
#371
Auto-translated
Lider1


Tazar is awesome ;)
Wistan is awesome;)
Brogkh is awesome;)
The swamp is just ridiculously overpowered – it needs to be banned.

"Это нам идеально подходит!" [Новосибирск, 2013]
"Красавчик! Если только не читер.." [Киев, 2014]
"Это Вам не шутки - нажрался Dust в маршрутке" [Новокузнецк, 2015]
Сам ты фиш (с) :D
2
⚖️
0
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
Offline Мститель
Registered:
Posts: 498
#372
Auto-translated
Wlk777
1. All the strong players I know hire a lot of heroes; in my successful games, the problem of a shortage of the 8-hero limit appears quite quickly. The desire to limit the number of heroes clearly indicates the level of play, as well as...
2. It is precisely the use of what you called "early-level resources" in the early days of online games that mainly determines the outcome of the game, for your information. I am increasingly convinced that you know very little about 3 heroes and probably cannot play them properly.
1. No one disputes this; it is true. I've been saying this from the beginning.
2. You yourself claim that "I said so."

That is, I don't understand at all what you wanted to say.
I agree completely that I play Heroes 5 much better than Heroes 3.
But you would express your thought a little more clearly so that we could discuss it further!
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Мститель
User Avatar
Offline Wlk777
Registered:
Posts: 2,544
#373
Auto-translated
Avenger
1. No one argues with that; it's true. I've been saying this from the beginning.
2. You yourself claim that "I said so."

So, I don't understand what you wanted to say at all.
I completely agree that I play Heroes 5 much better than Heroes 3.
But you could express your thought a little more clearly so that we could continue the discussion!
I'll try to be clearer: in online battles in Heroes 3 between strong players, the outcome is determined precisely by the ability to play with units of the initial levels; it doesn't happen very often that the game reaches Archangels, although you also need to know how to control them. Although, there's nothing wrong with the fact that if you manage to develop to that point, the game becomes easier, of course; I don't see this as a punishment for the difficulties in building them. As for buying additional heroes for more money, there's little point in it; it's unlikely to make the game more interesting, it might only slightly (and I mean slightly) level the playing field between novice and experienced players online.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
Offline SteN
Registered:
Posts: 436
#374
Auto-translated
Are there any drawbacks to the third game? :smile07:
Иногда они возвращаются :smile27:
Бросайте флуд и оффтоп из раздела пятерки в Флудовские ссылки или мне в личку.
2
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Mir
Registered:
Posts: 5
#375
Auto-translated
I don't know, I think I like everything, but something is missing. I don't understand what it is myself.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Ty3o-ny3o
Registered:
Posts: 110
#376
Auto-translated
Actually, I feel the opposite: I don't like many of the things that modders and game developers try to introduce into Heroes 3. But the classic version, the official Heroes 3, satisfies everyone because it's a classic. With all its advantages and disadvantages. But even if something is wrong with it, I wouldn't dare criticize a game that I've devoted almost 10 years of my life to. I'm used to everything.
1
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline reptile
Registered:
Posts: 76
#377
Auto-translated
There are no drawbacks to the third installment; it’s (at least for me) the best strategy game of all time.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline Erutan Rivol
Registered:
Posts: 193
#378
Auto-translated
Oh, I would change so many things... but let's leave that job to the developers.
Абстрактной истины нет, истина всегда конкретна. (Ленин)
ICQ 671097837
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Burzum
User Avatar
Offline bolotnik
Registered:
Posts: 216
#380
Auto-translated
Burzum
I don't like it when a secondary Sorceress or Eagle Eye is offered to a hero :(
but a secondary hero with the Sorceress skill can be quite useful: being able to transfer spells from one hero to another on some maps will be very important, for example:
on a map, one hero receives from a scholar on the map or from a Pandora's Box: Resurrection, Town Portal, and other such spells of levels 3-4, then the hero-sorceress transfers these spells from that hero to the other heroes we play with.
0
⚖️
0
Offline Plotnick
Registered:
Posts: 70
#381
Auto-translated
In the third game, I don't like the useless features, just like in other games. For example, skills like "Keen Eye" or "Scouting". Or spells like "Protection from...", "Remove Obstacle", or "Frenzy". Also, there are artifacts that are not even worth picking up. In general, I don't like anything that seems pointless. I also don't like the need to buy spellbooks for non-mage units. Actually, if you think about it, you can come up with a lot of minor things. But overall, the third game is the best.
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Plotnick
User Avatar
Offline Rabe
Registered:
Posts: 165
#382
Auto-translated
Plotnick
I don't like useless features in the third game, just like everywhere else.
For example, the skills "Keen Eye" and "Scouting".
Or spells like "Protection from...", "Remove Obstacle", or "Berserk", for example.
There are also artifacts that aren't even worth picking up.
In general, I don't like anything that seems pointless.
I also don't like the need to buy a spellbook for non-mages.

Actually, if you think about it, you can come up with a lot of minor things that are annoying. But overall, the third game is the best.
I agree with the last sentence 100%, but not with the first part:
Scouting is one of the best skills for scouting. And if there's a hut with scouting next to the castle, EVERYONE except the main hero will visit it.
Berserk is also great when a unit is guaranteed not to be attacked. It really almost doubles or triples the damage for archers, for example.
The question is that there are usually other spells that are more suitable and effective.
And artifacts are at least worth the gold you get from selling them to a merchant, not to mention that they can be found through quests.

Can anyone name a game where there's absolutely nothing лишнего (superfluous) and useless? It's hard enough to get rid of clutter and "just in case" items in real life
"Одержать сто побед в ста битвах — это не вершина воинского искусства. Повергнуть врага без сражения — вот вершина.
"Сущность войны — обман. Искусный должен изображать неумелость. При готовности атаковать демонстрируй подчинение. Когда ты близок — кажись далёким, но когда ты очень далеко — притворись, будто ты рядом."
0
⚖️
0
In reply to Rabe
Offline Plotnick
Registered:
Posts: 70
#383
Auto-translated
What's the point of breaking it down into details? There's also the useless skill "First Aid," and I would argue about the usefulness of "Haste." Besides, "Haste" isn't the only spell that is practically unused. It's just too much work to make a list. Obviously, there are things that just sit there collecting dust. And if they were improved, then the game would become perfect.
Rabe

Can anyone give me just one game where there's nothing лишнего and useless? It would be great to get rid of the clutter and the "maybe it will be useful" items in real life.

I won't. We're talking about a specific game and what we don't like about IT.
0
⚖️
0
User Avatar
Offline dnaop-wr
Registered:
Posts: 1,014
#384
Auto-translated
If nothing bad happens, then nothing good will happen either, because everything is defined in comparison.
Техника в руках индейца мертва.
Справочник по НоММ-4 http://handbookhmm.ru/pamyatka-dlya-heroes-iv.html
Памятка по НоММ-3 http://handbookhmm.ru/pamyatka-dlya-homm-iii.html
и HotA http://handbookhmm.ru/vyishla-obnovlennaya-pamyatka-dlya-homm-iii-hota.html
0
⚖️
0