Posts from Round table Auto-translated

You, Pash, would be better off focusing on defeating grandmasters on the first level instead of suggesting these questionable amendments.

P.S. By the way, Orrin, he is essentially the only dangerous opponent for Tazar (not counting, of course, the Armormasters) at high levels and without magic. Kragg, somewhere around level 27, is comparable to him in strength (but since the troops are different levels, he will be weaker overall due to the reduced impact of offense when there is a difference between defense and attack).

I don't really understand these formulas (meaning I've seen them, but I don't grasp them mathematically), and I'm always curious. For example, who would be stronger: Valeska at level 20 or Orrin at level 20? Assuming there are no other artifacts that boost ranged attack, and the attacking unit is just an archer.
In my opinion, Valeska would be stronger. But I haven't played with Orrin.

According to statistics, the red faction has better spawn rates. About 30% better across all key metrics.

P.S.: Note the interesting fact that against Valeska, there are two stacks of peasants, while against Orrin, there are three, which means Valeska is more respected ;)

According to statistics, the Red faction performs better. By about 30% across all key metrics.

As someone who plays mostly as Red, I've noticed that Blue generally has fewer paths, on average.

The number of neutral stacks depends not only on the difficulty level but also on the coordinates of the battle point. In this case, the coordinates are not identical; it needs to be tested with identical coordinates.

P.S. By the way, what's the deal with the passages on Balance – can anyone give a proper answer?