Skip to content

Posts from Test. Your political and economic orientation. Auto-translated

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
#1
Auto-translated
Based on the nature of your answers, the test concludes that you are more aligned with the ideology of Social Liberalism.
image Social liberalism is a type of liberalism that advocates (in contrast to neoliberalism) for government intervention in economic processes. It is closely related to social democracy. Unlike classical liberalism, which viewed the market as a self-regulating entity and negatively viewed the possibility of regulating economic and social relations, social liberals believe that in order to implement the main principle of liberalism in practice – ensuring the individual's right to self-determination and self-realization – it is not always sufficient to rely solely on their own efforts. Equalizing starting opportunities is impossible without the participation of the state, and it is the state that must ensure the redistribution of a portion of the social product in favor of the socially vulnerable members of society, providing them with support and thereby contributing to the harmonization of social relations and the strengthening of social and political stability. However, unlike various types of socialist ideology, social liberals are committed to a capitalist type of economy.
Take the test
Правила форума
FAQ по Heroes VI
Форумная мафия
[readonly]
User Avatar
#2
Auto-translated
O_O Interesting :)
Based on the nature of your answers, the test has concluded that you are more aligned with the ideology of Totalitarianism.
image This is a political regime characterized by extremely broad (total) control of the state over all aspects of society. The goal of such control over the economy and society is to organize them according to a single plan. Under a totalitarian regime, the entire population of the state is mobilized to support the government (ruling party) and its ideology, while the priority of public interests over private ones is declared. Totalitarian regimes are often criticized by the international community.
Take the test
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#3
Auto-translated
Based on the nature of your answers, the test concludes that you are more aligned with the ideology of Totalitarianism.
image This is a political regime characterized by extremely broad (total) control of the state over all aspects of society. The goal of such control over the economy and society is to organize them according to a single plan. Under a totalitarian regime, the entire population of the state is mobilized to support the government (ruling party) and its ideology, while the priority of public interests over private ones is declared. Totalitarian regimes are often criticized by the international community.
Take the test
But Hitler accomplished in 7 years what we haven't been able to do in 15. Moreover, the situation in Germany in 1933 was much worse, and Germany did not have as many resources as we do. This does not refer to the positive aspects of the national genocide policy.
Хороший сон укрепляет боевой дух. Хорошая еда укрепляет боевой дух. Хорошие деньги укрепляют боевой дух. А больше всего укрепляет боевой дух - отсутствие врага.
User Avatar
#6
Auto-translated
Based on the nature of your answers, the test concludes that you are more aligned with the ideology of Social Democracy.
image Social democracy took root in European politics after World War I. Democratic socialist parties have actively participated and continue to participate in the governments of Sweden, Finland, West Germany and unified Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, and some other countries, such as post-communist Hungary, Poland, and Bulgaria. These parties use socialist ideology, and in economics, they advocate for the creation of a "welfare state" based on the corresponding Keynesian theory. Increasing pensions and social benefits is their achievement. Social democracy is often confused with "democratic socialism," but in essence, these are completely different political movements. Social democracy is largely very similar to Social Liberalism, but it places greater emphasis not on the economic market, but on ensuring social protection for vulnerable segments of the population.
Take the test

Be strong. Believe
#7
Auto-translated
Based on the nature of your responses, the test concludes that you are more aligned with the ideology of Socialism. Socialism proclaims the elimination of all forms of human exploitation. A socialist society is understood as a society where complete popular sovereignty, social justice, and a significant reduction in alienation in labor have been achieved, and economic differentiation is minimal, where the rights and freedoms of the individual are respected, and where remnants of economic inequality do not hinder the free and harmonious development of each individual. The goal of socialism is to transfer the means of production from private ownership to the ownership of an organized society, the state. Karl Marx is considered to have played a major role in the development of socialist ideas, but in addition to him, there were many other thinkers who adhered to this direction of social thought. Socialism gained widespread popularity in the 20th century. The development of Karl Marx's ideas took place in the works of V. Lenin, but subsequently, the Soviet Union "deviated" from pure Marxism
User Avatar
#8
Auto-translated
Based on the nature of your answers, the test concludes that you are more aligned with the ideology of Communism.
image According to Marxist theory, communism is a socio-economic formation that replaces capitalism, free from class exploitation, and based on public ownership of the means of production. The second, higher phase of this formation is a classless society, the principle of which is "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." Vladimir Ilyich Lenin stated that the first (transitional) phase of communist society should be a social structure – a proletarian state as a form of organization of political power of the working class, in which all the main means of production (land, subsoil, factories with their equipment, finance, etc.) are the property of this state (the country is one large Factory). Unfortunately, despite all the promises of party leaders, communism in its pure form was not built in the USSR.
Take the test
Not surprising. I'm for communism :)
(That's how it was in the USSR, right? A law is issued - everyone follows it.
And not like now, when people have become too relaxed.)

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное - Список НПС -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl
User Avatar
#9
Auto-translated
Considering the nature of your answers, the test concluded that you are more aligned with the ideology of Solidarity.
A political and economic strategy for mobilizing society during periods of serious crises or threats. It sharply increases the mobilization capabilities of social relations and its effectiveness through the synergistic effect that arises when different social groups realize the commonality of their interests and take coordinated actions. It has similar postulates to Corporatism, which advocated for the creation of Corporate states, where class struggle would be replaced by class cooperation in the name of the prosperity of the corporate state. Today, Solidarity is used as an ideology for reform; for example, Yulia Tymoshenko, in her speeches, called for a transition of the economy towards Solidarity. In the 1930s, Russian (White) émigrés abroad created the Union of Russian Solidarists, which aimed to overthrow communism in the USSR.
Everything seems fine, except for the mention of Tymoshenko and some dubious "White" organizations... This is actually the policy of the USSR during the period of industrialization, that's what it is. The construction of new cities based on pure enthusiasm, huge factories, railways, and plants that spring up in a matter of months. This is a state whose power is concentrated in the hands of young, energetic people, and not old fogeys reading speeches from a piece of paper. In general, I am close to socialism in all its modifications. Everything depends on the specific historical moment - for example, for Russia now, national socialism would be the best, for the USA - social democracy, for India - social liberalism. In any case, the state must take care of its citizens, and not profit from them or conduct dubious experiments.
Как можно сделать мутную воду прозрачной?
- Не трогай её, и она очистится сама. :smile04: