Posts from What do you think?

the subject, of course.

Feeling good!

kill the idiot
hunt the scum

what's the actual difference?

"Burn the heretic" doesn't really appeal to me; it feels rather detached...
But I think everything else is pretty good, so I voted for "all."

not enough... there are far more people to kill than just three options.

for example...all

Politics should originate from the people, but what if you eliminate everyone who could contribute to the political process?
Besides, if you eliminate all the aforementioned categories, there will be absolutely no one left in our country!

And why didn’t you add an option like “do good deeds, be merciful”???

Oh, sorry, I didn't notice that the topic was created by Lok, now it's clear why there's no such option.

true democracy must be unambiguous in the matter of eliminating elements that are corrupting the country!
in my opinion: heretics are already suffering from our actions, and soon they will all be impaled; idiots will either die out or will not survive in the natural environment; but the rabble – the largest group, and also the most socially repulsive – should be eliminated.

I don't think that fools will simply disappear; on the contrary, it seems to me that they are becoming more sophisticated every day, adapting to the current world order, and some are even simultaneously acting like uncivilized people. Usurpation and assimilation.

It's not a certainty. But in general, if every person had the right to shoot another person in the head with a Magnum once in their lifetime, people would treat each other much more politely.

They would have just shot each other! How ignorant! Immoral! And undemocratic! P.S. And I like it, lol.

and they would probably resort to looting much less often.

So, there's a whole shot available. Wouldn't you kill everyone with a single bullet? And would you dare to rob someone, knowing they might take you down? Heh-heh-heh.