Posts from Which Haven heroes do you prefer? Auto-translated

For humans, I choose Axel on large maps... and Vittorio on small maps.

And Vittorio has a really powerful one... There's already such a ballista there... May God help us.

And Vittorio has really powerful ones... There's already such a powerful ballista there... May God help you.

Yes, a ballista with an attack of 30+, of course, especially with fire arrows. A difference of 30 in attack increases the damage by 2.5 times. However, in the late game, it's much easier to destroy a ballista. Many cities have creatures that attack more than one cell, meaning you can simply target it with someone without wasting a turn. Although, in an extreme situation, you can spend a turn on it.

So, first you need to get there))). And I have the fiercest defensive unit guarding it – the Zealot. Once you put him on guard duty... WOW... So, the ballista is well-protected. Another thing is that you can also cast a spell with a hero... The Ring of Equality will defeat the ballista in a duel, about twice.

I always choose Rutger, and Isabel is also great. I think betting on a hero's ability is a terrible idea. Strategy is the key to success. I choose the hero whose avatar I like more.

I'll choose the one with the avatar I like more.

The hero's avatar? And this is a strategy? In my opinion, you should look at the abilities first, and then at the skills. After playing for a while and understanding the different advantages and disadvantages, everyone chooses the race/hero that suits them best, for their tactics and strategy. Also, it's a very simple fact that each race and hero has its own tactics and strategies. In short, you shouldn't choose based on avatars.

When choosing a hero, I pay attention to 3 factors (as do most players, I suppose): special ability, starting skills, and army. That's why I like two heroes: Dugald and Axel. Dugald is good because of his starting archers and the bonus to them, plus I like to develop his machinery (firearms + rapid-fire ballista), although you can also level up Battle Battle, as there are plenty of archers. Axel is not bad in the late game because his starting troops are not outstanding, but his special ability is good: it enhances knights, their range, and the Overseer skill. Neither of them has any unnecessary skills leveled up; everything is relevant. Dugald focuses on attack with ranged units, while Axel focuses on attack with Overseer. Ellaina is a great secondary hero because of her bonus to the "Tax Collector" skill – we give her all the peasants, and we get money.

I like Laslo. His face is finally the way it should be for a warrior; those sweet Dugals with Rutgers and the lopsided, dull Axel – that’s not it. Besides, the cultists become simply superb when they’re good, and it’s also convenient to start with them, including using them to take out archers. Although sometimes I play as Dugals and Rutgers too. But such a banal start is already getting tiresome.

I always played as *Necromancers*. Now I'm playing as humans. Axel. Isabelle. **Rutger.**

I like the heroine who favors peasants; I usually take her as my first hero before starting a scenario and immediately buy another one in the tavern.

My choice is Axel. He is a Paladin, and this is clearly visible in battle, especially when you have Knights or Paladins on your side.

Does his ability affect the Death Knight?

Does his ability affect Death Knights?

Of course not. Because the ability description doesn't say anything about it. Don't make assumptions.

Dugald’s archers deal decent damage, and Rutger is quite mobile, but I don’t like Axel.

Vittorio - rulezz!!:smile14: I usually level up Chaos, Luck, and Machines. With Vittorio, I need to level up less:D I also like Ellaine. With other heroes, peasants are worthless, but at least they can fight:smile13: