Skip to content

Posts from World War III: what are your predictions? Auto-translated

5.0 (1 rating)
Open
In your opinion, what is the probability of World War III starting in the next 10 years?
43 voters
Single choice Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
#16
Auto-translated
China is focused on an unspoken alliance with Russia,

The alliance lasted until 2014-2015, and then there was a war; I can't say anything for sure.
Чую время пришло и захлопнулась дверь
Ангел пропел и полопалась кожа...
Мы выпили жизнь, но не стали мудрей,
Мы прожили смерть, но не стали моложе...

Агата Кристи
Ты должен быть сильным,
Ты должен уметь сказать: Руки прочь, прочь от меня,
Ты должен быть сильным, иначе зачем тебе быть?!

КИНО
User Avatar
#18
Auto-translated
That’s what I mean by a bloodless war, not about pushing buttons and nuclear suitcases.
Борьба и единство противоположностей -
вечный двигатель мира сего.
#19
Auto-translated
2 Syver
With a population of approximately 1.3 billion people, the Armed Forces number approximately 2,350 thousand people. The reserve is 500-600 thousand people. Paramilitary formations (People's Armed Police) – 1 million 500 thousand people.
The People's Liberation Army of China (PLA) numbers 2.5 million people. The reduction in the PLA's numbers is planned to be carried out primarily by reducing non-combat units and numerous research institutes. In 2005, 200 thousand servicemen will leave the army.
And finally, here's a final thought:

2 Dragon

The alliance can be extended. That's one. Not an alliance doesn't mean war. That's two.
O God of Earth and Altar,
Bow down and hear our cry,
Our earthly rulers falter,
Our people drift and die,
The walls of gold entomb us,
The swords of scorn divide,
Take not thy thunder from us,
Take away our pride.


G.K. Chesterton: English Hymnal
User Avatar
#20
Auto-translated
Okay, Major ;) I was wrong. But then it becomes even more important for both of us to form an alliance.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#21
Auto-translated
People, understand that no matter how large an army is, it can't do anything against technology. So, first and foremost, we need to promote scientific and military research, no matter what. And only then should we start forming alliances.
Хороший сон укрепляет боевой дух. Хорошая еда укрепляет боевой дух. Хорошие деньги укрепляют боевой дух. А больше всего укрепляет боевой дух - отсутствие врага.
User Avatar
#22
Auto-translated
People, understand that no matter how large an army is, it cannot stand against technology. Therefore, the primary focus should be on promoting scientific and military research.

I'm sorry to disappoint you, but not everything is always so straightforward. Remember the Roman Empire, which had many brilliant scientists and, among other things, war machines created by Archimedes. And yet, various barbarians managed to break through and destroy such a powerful civilization.
Чую время пришло и захлопнулась дверь
Ангел пропел и полопалась кожа...
Мы выпили жизнь, но не стали мудрей,
Мы прожили смерть, но не стали моложе...

Агата Кристи
Ты должен быть сильным,
Ты должен уметь сказать: Руки прочь, прочь от меня,
Ты должен быть сильным, иначе зачем тебе быть?!

КИНО
In reply to Dracon Малласа
User Avatar
#23
Auto-translated
Dracon Mallasa;173243
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but not everything is always so straightforward. Remember the Roman Empire, which had many brilliant scientists and, among them, war machines created by Archimedes. And yet, various barbarians managed to seize power and destroy such a powerful civilization.
You're comparing apples and oranges. These are completely different eras!
Правила форума
FAQ по Heroes VI
Форумная мафия
[readonly]
In reply to Amko
User Avatar
#24
Auto-translated
Night Nazgul;173246
You can’t compare them. These are completely different eras!
The Great Patriotic War, when our troops used overwhelming numerical superiority (and also had an advantage in equipment, but on the other hand, the more people there are, the more equipment can be produced).
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#25
Auto-translated
Damn, they didn't understand again...
In Iraq, for example, the Americans had this tactic: if a shot was fired somewhere 10 km away, they would immediately fire a shell – BOOM!!! – and then silence...

That's what I meant by "technique."

P.S. Dragon, I'm sorry to disappoint you, but those very barbarians had the same ballistas (and don't tell me they were catapults. Actually, ballistas are stone-throwing machines, and catapults are what you all called ballistas))), plus they mastered new techniques for processing iron and steel, the technique of multi-layer forging, they started using armor, and finally, they had excellent military leaders, while the Romans had recently lost their best general...

Added 2 minutes later
Sever, by the way, it's not necessarily true that if there are many people, there is a lot of equipment – I'm saying, it's all about quality!)) You can, for example, set up a factory where 500 people work and produce 1 tank in 5 days (FOR EXAMPLE!), or you can create an automated workshop where 5 people work and produce a tank in 3 days. Which is more profitable and better?))
Хороший сон укрепляет боевой дух. Хорошая еда укрепляет боевой дух. Хорошие деньги укрепляют боевой дух. А больше всего укрепляет боевой дух - отсутствие врага.
User Avatar
#26
Auto-translated
Siever, by the way, isn't necessarily the best option; if there are many people, that means there's a lot of equipment – as I said, it all comes down to quality!)) For example, you can set up a factory where 500 people work and produce 1 tank in 5 days (FOR EXAMPLE!), or you can create an automated workshop where 5 people work and produce a tank in 3 days. Which is more profitable and better?))
Alternatively, we can make a tank that's "simpler" and faster, for example, 3 light tanks for every 1 heavy enemy tank. Besides, China is developing rapidly; in the worst-case scenario, they'll put pressure on the Japanese, and they'll "share" technology as a sign of eternal brotherhood between the Japanese and Chinese peoples.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#27
Auto-translated
Siver, by the way, isn't necessarily the best option; if there are many people, there will be a lot of equipment – I'm saying, it's all about quality!)) For example, you can build a factory with 500 employees that produces 1 tank in 5 days (FOR EXAMPLE!), or you can create an automated workshop with 5 employees that produces a tank in 3 days. Which is more efficient and better?))

Ha, maybe it's not necessarily the best option, but during the same Great Patriotic War, the Germans had better Tigers and Panthers, but they were expensive, and there were still more of the Soviet T-34 tanks.
You're comparing apples and oranges. These are completely different eras!
The point is the same: a faceless horde with a thirst for destruction can destroy any advanced civilization. If, for example, the Chinese and the peoples of Africa decide that they have been oppressed for all time and it's time to take revenge, then the whole world is in trouble – even super-duper technology won't save them.
And finally, a simple truth: to kill with a bullet, you need to fire a rifle, and to fire a rifle, you need a person. So, it's not a fact that that one *Rambo* who stops World War III will survive.
Чую время пришло и захлопнулась дверь
Ангел пропел и полопалась кожа...
Мы выпили жизнь, но не стали мудрей,
Мы прожили смерть, но не стали моложе...

Агата Кристи
Ты должен быть сильным,
Ты должен уметь сказать: Руки прочь, прочь от меня,
Ты должен быть сильным, иначе зачем тебе быть?!

КИНО
User Avatar
#28
Auto-translated
It's foolish in our modern age to wage war with infantry, technology, nuclear weapons, and counterintelligence. When there is such classified equipment that can wage both psychological and climate warfare. Using high-frequency devices to put pressure on people's minds, and no army, even one of 200 million, can do anything about it. Press a few buttons on the devices, and the army will destroy itself. And climate weapons, such as weather storms, can knock any nuclear missile off course, causing it to hit, for example, not the Kremlin, but Antarctica due to the weather storm – and then the ice will melt and everyone will be flooded. And those tornadoes in the United States. And Katrina. Therefore, there will definitely not be a third world war; everyone will simply be too afraid. War is waged through cunning.

Now, I will express my opinion about the USA. They are the most real world bandits. They destroyed Yugoslavia, destroyed Vietnam, got involved in Afghanistan, destroyed Iraq, and are pumping oil out of there. NATO was always created with only one goal: to destroy the Soviet Union.
:smile16: Сенатор клана Рыцари Апокалипсиса:smile16:



Набор в Клан Рыцари Апокалипсиса
User Avatar
#29
Auto-translated
Well, regardless, there will always be traitors on each side who will harm one faction and help another, one way or another. And you are right about the USA.
Чую время пришло и захлопнулась дверь
Ангел пропел и полопалась кожа...
Мы выпили жизнь, но не стали мудрей,
Мы прожили смерть, но не стали моложе...

Агата Кристи
Ты должен быть сильным,
Ты должен уметь сказать: Руки прочь, прочь от меня,
Ты должен быть сильным, иначе зачем тебе быть?!

КИНО
User Avatar
#36
Auto-translated
I heard somewhere that if there's a third world war, it will be like this:
RUSSIA, CHINA VS USA, EU.
We'll kick their asses!
America first.
СМЕРТЬ ПОПСЕ!:smile10: