Posts from "Random" vs. "Fixed" Auto-translated

I'd like to add my two cents.
I don't understand why there should be so many different rankings; more numbers and tables just create more confusion for players and other forum visitors. It would be better to have just one ranking, so people can come, look, and easily understand everything.
Separating ranked games into a separate ranking is a necessity because, no matter how you look at it, you can't equate them to full-fledged, multi-hour games. As for random elements or fixes, in my opinion, there isn't much difference; all the shortcomings and bugs of randomness are balanced by well-refined rules. So, it's better to consider fixes and random elements as one ranking.
One inconvenience is that you have to copy part of the report, and can't ss-d view it in a special thread for "Seasons of the Year" reports and count from there? Or is it necessary to copy it?

Can ss-d not view the special topic for Seasons of the Year reports and extract the data from there? Or is it necessary to copy it?

Let's put ourselves in SS-D's shoes: The person rarely visits the forum, and if they do, it's only to update the table. Currently, the following tournaments are running: "Clan War," "Favorites in Battle," "You Scratch My Back," and the Seasonal Tournament is starting. They are probably unaware of some of the tournaments that are taking place. How should they proceed in this case? Should they search the entire forum and count all the games? This would create a lot of confusion with the calculations, etc. I think it would not be difficult for players to duplicate the report header in the corresponding topic so that they are included in the ranking.

Try playing on my map where I honed my skills :D