Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Dude, I wasn't talking about you:D Your intellect is far from titanic. It mainly revolves around drinking, music, and boobs)))) A worthy generation is growing up:) Almost like Al Bundy) .
Guys! Let's all get along!eXeCuToR;168844
Oh, Loken... You hurt my feelings... I thought you would comfort me, tell me that I'm not as stupid as I seem... But you... Drinking... Boobs... Actually, there are other parts of the female body that I like, and I also love motorcycles and movies! You don't appreciate me... I'm leaving.
No need to leave. I think you need a partner, and I even know the topic. P.S.: I'll try to organize everything earlier.
Added 5 minutes later Hero In;168889
This is called sophistry... reasoning based on the deliberate violation of the laws of logic, and on the use of false arguments =)
Thanks for the clarification. Will you participate?
Умирает не тот, кто устал, а тот, кто остановился.
What are we arguing about:
eXeCuToR and Denminator. Does everyone have their price?
White Wolf and Lelya. Is it possible to get by without higher education?
Timy and Gur. Is love or money what makes the world go round?
Agilist and Loken. Is a healthy lifestyle necessary?
Kitty and Siverfale. What is more important: intelligence or strength?
Умирает не тот, кто устал, а тот, кто остановился.
Agilist, what if both participants agree on the same thing?)) What if Kitty and Siever both believe that reason is more important than strength?)) Or are they forced to defend only one side? =)
I think we should focus on defending one thing. I don't really care what it is, but I can try to prove that it has value. Unless, of course, I'm forced to argue the opposite.
Step aside from the way of a better man than you So you fall at his feet hes the one who betrays you Its the servants devotion for the decay Stand up
I came across a rather strange question. After all, there is such a thing as the power of the mind, right?:D It would be better to exchange strength for beauty or something like that...
So back off your rules, Back off your jive! Cause I'm sick of not living, To stay alive, Leave me alone! I'm not asking a lot - I just don't want to be controlled, That's all I want. All I want!
Yes, indeed :) Everyone will probably take turns arguing in this thread, and in the end, the forum members will vote. I don't see any other way.
So back off your rules, Back off your jive! Cause I'm sick of not living, To stay alive, Leave me alone! I'm not asking a lot - I just don't want to be controlled, That's all I want. All I want!
Sorry for the long absence. I was trying to revive the internet, and I succeeded.
Arandor;169168
Agilist, what if both participants agree on the same thing?)) What if Kitty and Siever both believe that intelligence is more important than strength?)) Or is there a forced requirement to defend a single point of view? =)
Yes, we're forcing you to defend a single point of view.
Kitty;169168
I got a strange question. After all, there is such a thing as the power of the mind, right? It would be better to exchange strength for beauty or something like that...
Well, I think it makes sense to change the topic if you show me how you can break down a wall with the power of your mind:D. I mean physical strength.
Gur;169168
Question for the organizer, how will the debate proceed?
Right now, a topic will be created for each group, in which ONLY they will debate. I want to note that the topics and what each person has to prove are distributed STRICTLY randomly and not by me, but by my computer.
Kitty;169168
Yes, indeed. Most likely, everyone will take turns debating in this topic, and in the end, forum members will vote. I don't see any other way.
But I do. Participants debate until someone can't answer anymore. This seems impossible, but for this, I will introduce a couple of restrictions.
1. It is forbidden to repeat the same argument, for example:
To be or not to be? -To be! -No, life is stupid, it's better not to be. -Still, you have to live! -We suffer in this life. -But it's better to live! 2. Don't spam and steer the topic in a different direction.
3. Constantly send messages, thereby confusing the opponent.
4. Insult and otherwise circumvent the opponent.
I think that's enough. In addition, I hope that we all have enough courage to admit our defeat.
May the strongest (one) win!
Умирает не тот, кто устал, а тот, кто остановился.
Looks like I was late again... But I'm ready to debate any topic if you want.
So many centuries So many Gods We were the prisoners of our own fantasy But now we are marching Against these Gods I'm the wizard, I will change it all Valhalla - Deliverance Why've you ever forgotten me
19.08.2008 СК Олимпийский.Я запомню это навсегда!!!
Yes, I think it would be a good idea to add new participants and organize new discussions as we go, without waiting for the current ones to end. After all, it's just a game.
Agilist
