Posts from Attention! Floodscar 2008.

I have an idea: let's create a separate thread for awards, like a trophy gallery. And for each award image, we can add a description explaining who it belongs to, maybe even a link to their profile. What do you think?

Hmm. Interesting:)

And "Picnic" devoured my brain! Completely!

The idea is good, but it will be implemented after the flood war is over.

I think yes, it's a good idea. Holy cow!!! Thirty characters.

yes, thirty characters are already annoying:) let's get rid of the thirty-character limit - we'll chat for a bit until 20 minutes have passed...

Added after 16 minutes
so, are we doing it? 20 minutes have passed - here are your 30 characters...

To be honest, the word "flood" in almost every other post is already repulsive. Lately, all I see is "flood, flooding, flooder, flooders..."
Even the name of the sub-section makes me want to throw up. They could have called it something like "tavern" or "freedom of speech"...

ATTENTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The voting has begun, and flooding is now prohibited. Discussion will take place in the Heroes chat for now, and then there will be a separate topic.
The first nomination is "Most Serious Face of the Forum" - this refers not only to seriousness, but also to a certain calmness. The person who fits this nomination has every post carefully considered and contains a complete thought, their opinion is well-founded, and they treat other people's opinions with respect. They may even be a fan of flooding, but they never flood in the designated topics.

In principle, there are surprisingly many people who fit this nomination. The forum is very good in terms of both flooding and serious communication (especially the section dedicated to Heroes 4), but, strangely enough, when I came up with this nomination, I already knew who I would vote for...
Major Whirlwind
In principle, Whirlwind is not exactly an example of seriousness (see Creator))) and often floods, but when I see that Whirlwind has left the latest message in a topic, I will most likely go there because I know that it won't be a two-line post; it will be a detailed message with his opinion, with evidence and examples. It will be interesting to argue with him, as the argument will be constructive and respectful to the opponents, especially this is noticeable in the rather flood-prone section on Heroes 5. I am not hesitating at all in giving my vote to Whirlwind.

P.S.
Please make sure that the nickname of the person you are voting for is highlighted in bold with spaces in the GENITIVE case, as I did.

Exz, and you don't even know which of my organs is responsible for flooding the chat))))))

P.S. okay... I won't keep you in suspense) I'll just say that it's my BRAIN! great and mighty... probably I have a lot of RAM, that's why I think so fast (although not always, but that's just because of the antivirus, as it consumes a lot of RAM), also I have a good video card, because my imagination is good and I can imagine a lot =)))

Nazg... well, maybe not entirely normal in the mental sense, but otherwise cool))))) IMHO, of course ;D

what other sword??... I'll wave it at you now...

WHAT??!! what is this stick, stick, cucumber thing... some kind of nonsense turned out)) I'm not that bad!.. my head is straight and everything else too)))...
NOW I'LL TAKE IT AND CHOP EVERYONE WITH THIS SWORD! that you gave me)) muahaha...

P.S.S. I want a statuette with a sword in my hand!!

I'm at a loss... I don't even know who to give the "serious face" badge to... let it be XAKER.

Saruman - I deeply respect this person, although mostly for actions not on this forum, well, and that's that. In general, I would also have voted for Alan, but his recent actions have greatly changed my opinion of him. Although he certainly fits the definition of Alucard...

I think it's Alan. He always provides arguments for his posts. I hope those who didn't participate won't be offended by this discussion.

plan... Zubr... I wrote a post... Alucard's wasn't here yet, so there's no need to conspire against me)... feel free to downvote as much as you want) I don't care...

Alan... well, since you want me to explain why, okay... he did a lot for the forum: he was a moderator (it's a shame he's not a moderator anymore), he organized tournaments, and he helped many people (newbies, veterans, and others) with advice, etc.... maybe it doesn't quite fit the image of a serious person, but still...

P.S. there are many worthy people on the forum...

Ar, you post once an hour =DDD Alucard's post has been up for a long time now))
Okay, that's enough chatter. Basta.

People, please provide more detailed comments, especially if you don't agree with someone else's opinion but want to express your own. So, think carefully before voting, and don't just say "Well, maybe." The comment here is actually more important than the vote itself, because everyone understands things in their own way.

I'm voting for Vayshan in the "most serious forum member" category. He's the kind of person who doesn't say anything unnecessary, and you won't find any pointless chatter from him. Look at the number of his posts – he always writes strictly on topic, which I recently confirmed while browsing one of the sections.
He might not visit the forum often, but I'm voting not for the result, but because I think it's the right thing to do.

P.S. Zubr, you shouldn't choose a nominee based on how much you respect them, or how much they've done, or because you've had drinks together, etc.
You should choose based on the nomination. I'm not imposing my opinion, but he's unlikely to fit the "most serious forum member" category. IMHO. Even though he's a good person.
P.P.S. I wonder if the clan members will vote for each other again?
P.P.P.S. Ar, you really went too far with that stupid post; it even annoyed me. It would be better if you deleted it.