Posts from What is more important: luck or fighting spirit?

Morale is key. With low morale, you might not even be able to start.

Morale is more important than luck because when negative morale occurs, the creature simply doesn't attack, whereas with negative luck, it still manages to inflict some damage. For undead, luck is definitely better, as morale never drops below 0!

Yes, in general, good morale and luck are key, but as skills, they only work along the path that leads to failure. I remember a battle in the Fortress against a Castle, where both had +3 magic resistance. That was intense. The elves shoot once successfully, then morale kicks in, then the Crusaders hit, dealing 2 damage, then luck kicks in, then morale again, and then they get a lucky hit back, and so on... The shouts of "Oops!" "HA-HA-HAA" "O-o-o-o-o" and "E-E-E-E" echoed throughout the house. P.S. The Fortress won.

Since I always play as Necropolis, I choose luck!

Since I always play as Necropolis, I choose luck!!!!

It would be stupid to take morality for Necropolis)).
Although in Heroes of Might and Magic V, there are even leadership skills for necromancers. But what's the point of taking it? If it were something like "Humiliation" and gave the opposite effect for Necropolis (-1, -2, -3 respectively), then it would be a different story))).

They have dragons, anti-morality, and all that, and the spirit of despondency helps them with it.

Thirdly, probably the fighting spirit, and fifthly, luck. These have the biggest impact on the battle.

it all depends on who you are fighting and who is left in the cell. But in most cases, it is better to choose luck.

Morale, of course. Why would I take Luck if my Morale is low? I always try to take Morale first, and then Luck.

Yes, I changed my mind; I'm not playing as Necropolis anymore, and Build-up Defense (BD) is much more important than Luck, although
Luck + BD = Awesome.

Thirdly, morale definitely has a better effect than luck (for those creatures that have it). Morale allows you to deal twice as much damage, while luck only increases damage by a small amount (although sometimes significantly, but less than a twofold increase).

Thirdly, morale is definitely better than luck (for those creatures that have it). Morale allows you to deal twice as much damage, while luck only allows you to deal a little more (although, sometimes, it can be significant, but less than a 2x multiplier).

Luck is better, for example, if you have 50 elves against two groups of 100 peasants, one group with 50 and the other with 50. With luck, you'll kill one group, but with morale, you'll kill both.
So, morale is better.

I'll say this: of course, everything depends on the circumstances, as always. When you already have one of the two, then naturally, getting the second will be just great. When you have luck and morale, the army becomes the most powerful.
If we're talking specifically about choosing between the two, I would think long and hard and consider the circumstances. If I knew for sure that the opponent couldn't negatively influence my morale, I would choose morale. If I know that they can influence it, I would choose luck. In general, I prefer morale.
You know, it's fun when Dark Knights have luck. Then it's really fun. Imagine: a Dark Knight (with its ability to deal double damage) attacks with luck. Now imagine what the damage will be? Quadruple! I remember it happening once. It was fun. Those who were attacked by the knights (I don't remember who their victims were) fell from a single such blow.
Taking leadership with the Undead is complete nonsense. It's just a waste of a skill slot. Sometimes you accidentally take a scholar who gives something random, and then you get leadership. I remember it happening, and he even gave a guy spell power when he was playing as Stronghold. It was hilarious.

Added 3 minutes ago

Thirdly, morale is definitely better than luck (for those creatures that have it). Morale allows you to deal twice as much damage, while luck only allows you to deal a little more (although, sometimes, it can be significant, but less than twice as much).

How does morale allow you to deal twice as much damage?:confused: Maybe you meant to say that about luck? It's luck that allows you to deal double damage. And morale allows you to attack again, but it doesn't guarantee that the second attack will be as strong as the first. How do you know that the second attack might be weaker than the first?
Dude, you probably confused morale with luck, then your statement will be correct.;)

I suggest the author of the topic create a poll.

I think this topic has run its course.