Posts from Necropolis or Castle (Which one is stronger?)

almost 100% - if a player uses Necropolis.

almost 100% - if a person is playing as Necromancer.

But a person is playing as Necromancer anyway - it's not a pet, is it? :D And if we're being serious, it's more convenient when playing as humans (if the game is specifically about that race); a Necromancer with that cloak is quite effective. ;)

Necromancers are always controlled by a player – they’re not pets, are they? :D But seriously, it’s more interesting when you play as humans (if the game is specifically about that race), with a necromancer and that cloak. ;)

I meant the computer game. But in general, when you have that cloak, the game becomes boring and uninteresting...

Ghosts, in addition to vampires, are good when you use a Martyr on the ghosts so that the damage goes to the vampire. Then the ghosts deal with the undead and age the living. And the vampires feed for both.
A vampire is useless against life.

I basically agree.
But in my opinion, Vampires and Death Knights are POWERFUL!!
P.s. Skeletons are also good!

Well, when you're surrounded by hordes of strong monsters, you can lose quite a few skeletons.

Skeletons DON'T get lost!!! :D and hordes are only beneficial to a Necromancer... the more meat around, the BETTER!!!! ;)

I completely believe that the Castle faction will crush the Necromancer faction! Necromancers have almost no archers (there is one, but he's so weak and expensive that it's not worth building him right away), while Humans have a decent archer. Also, their pikeman is better than a skeleton.

1 If anything, this weak unit will be better than the monk from the Castle.
2 There are FAR more skeletons than pikemen.

What makes this Lich better than a Monk? Just because it has a cloud? That's nonsense... the Monk hits harder.

What makes this Lich better than a Monk? Just because it has a cloud? Nonsense... the Monk hits harder.

It's just that everything is better overall. And tougher, hits harder, and has higher attack and defense, and it's also faster. ;) No matter how you look at it, it's lived longer in this world. :D

I definitely really like the Barbarian theme as a proud, independent tribe that respects only the strength of weapons and the wisdom of their shamans. But I am disappointed with playing as them in Heroes of Might and Magic III (especially after Heroes of Might and Magic II). They were taken and completely ruined. It is almost impossible to play with them. They die like flies, you build Cyclops, but they are not very effective, and the ultimate unit, Behemoth, has a speed of 9. Of course, if you test them one-on-one, its ability to remove 80% of defense is great. But who would attack a tank with spears? Behemoth will be hit a couple of times with Implosion, and then he will just be a cool, strong guy who used to be able to remove 80% of defense. Add to this some unfriendly behavior of his fellow warriors (the abilities of all units are somehow unbalanced), and the Barbarians are generally useless, unless you switch to developing another castle (if you have enough time and resources). And if you play on 200% difficulty, the only way to fight is to start as a cart driver (Gurnisson). Then, they might not let you switch horses midstream (switch to Crag Hack). Conclusion: a proud, independent tribe that respects only the strength of weapons and the wisdom of their shamans, which embodies the principle: "It is better to be twice dead than to rot in captivity." And you can't take that away from them.

You write well, but it's not relevant to the topic. P.S. Sorry for the off-topic comment.

The guy from the Castle levels up much faster. And in general, if you level up diplomacy, you'll have plenty of troops.

In general, the people are stronger there. There are archers (bowmen and fanatics), evil crusaders who attack champions twice, and archangels who revive undead, creating 1000 skeletons. There are vampires that respawn and become almost unbeatable with a large number of them. There are liches that can attack several people at once, black knights with 2 damage, and invisible dragons with fear or fatigue (I don't remember exactly). But, based on my own gameplay, it depends on the artifacts, magic, number of troops, morale, and luck, etc. However, in my tactics, the more archers there are, the easier it is to win battles, as everyone stands and engages in spellcasting and archer fire.

:smile14: There's no chance against the Necromancer's Robe (which is mainly collected on Easy and Normal difficulty)! We once played a hot-seat game with three players. Each of us took turns, and when it was their turn, they would go to another room so that no one could peek. So, I was playing as the Dungeon, MASTER was playing as the Tower, and KING was playing as Rampart. Everything was going well, and we were in the third month. We all had a lot of angels, seventh-level units, and excellent stats (we had cleared two Utopias each). But then, KING unexpectedly collected the Necromancer's Robe, found a Necromancer in the tavern, and started leveling him up (and, out of excitement, accidentally mentioned that he had collected the Robe). MASTER and I were offended by this and decided to help each other a little:smile14: and work together to take him down. We bought everything we could, and both of us had an explosion attack dealing 6200 damage. We also had all the necessary skills, such as attack, armor, and tactics. And what do you think? He defeated both of us, even though he only had 1230-1270 liches and a few other units from his castle. We lost almost all of our units (1100) in that battle, but the fact remains: with the Necromancer's Robe, it's a massacre :smile22: :smile51: for everyone!!:smile22:

Yes, a lot depends on the situation with artifacts and the arrangement of parameters, but nevertheless, I'll give it a shot.

mojno skazat chto necropolis silnie ochen.
1.skileti
2.ajivlenie mertvecov

esli pridumat likarstvo dlya etix mojno pabedit ix ochen legko... vot tolka vampiri i chornie ricari ))))