Posts from ⚔️Serberia Auto-translated

I don't think there will be anything left of Alessia, the dog, or us in general if Lok's decision prevails and we decide to fight against Zeno.

I think we'll take him down easily. 😎 Almost. And then he'll have 1 HP left and use his chalice.

What a loser Anselm is, it's just pathetic.

Added 4 minutes later
Against: Heroist, Plesen, Revan. For: loser, goblin, virgin. On neutral ground: Frag, Ment. Did I forget anyone?

The guard is also against the battle.

I understand that the player is against it, but according to the role-playing aspect, he believes that it's too late to turn back. Therefore, let him clarify his opinion, just in case.

I perceived it the same way. He told me that he would vote only if his opinion turned out to be decisive.

That's right.

I'm more against it.

For: loser, goblin, virgin.

It's like when you have nothing left to lose, just like Hvsh players in real life.

For: loser, goblin, virgin.

Alex and I are kind of like that too.

We don't lose anything except our pride, although in this case, it's not even pride, because the initial action was aggressive towards this weakling. If we win here but suffer losses, then we're losers. And after that, the game is unlikely to continue, even if some of us survive. If we all die, then we're ultra-losers. If we don't fight, we all survive and move one step closer to the end of the game, which we're already quite close to, as I think. The obvious option is to back off. We blinded his eye, he broke Anselm's leg, it's all fair. It won't be difficult to role-play this. Everyone was kissing up to him, but he's not even close to being worthy. If we kill him and everyone survives, remaining unharmed, meaning the best-case scenario happens, then we... don't get anything. Personally, I'm willing to fight; I don't care about the role-playing aspect, just for fun. Wipe? Okay, no problem. But it would be unfair to those who don't want to blindly follow orders. And "I'll die, whatever" is a loser's mindset, let's be honest. So, I'm for de-escalating the situation

Well, the squad leader has spoken, and the vote clearly indicates a preference. Let's get this sorted out.

.

I believe this analysis is inherently biased. There are good reasons to believe that this is the murderer – the cat doesn't like him, he's going to the ruler, even though the ruler or his wife didn't warn us about guests, he randomly beat up Anselm, just for being rude. In this mission, no one told us about exceptions that would allow us to wander around the forest. Of course, this theory could be wrong, but to completely ignore it is not right. If you want to downplay the situation, that's your business; I, like any other member of the party, will abide by the majority opinion, but don't pretend that saying "it was just a prank, bro))))" is the only reasonable option.

The obvious option is to back off. We blinded him, he broke Anselm's leg, it's all fair. It won't be difficult to role-play this. Everyone was kissing the boots of the "chosen one," but this isn't even close to being the "chosen one."

Let me offer an allegory. Imagine we are a group of thugs. No, even better – we are skinheads. Africans came to our town, and in the evening, we went to beat them up.
So, we walk down the street, see a black guy, and wham – hit him with a pipe. The black guy pulls out a non-lethal weapon and shoots the whole group. No one died, everyone is conscious, but one person's knee was shattered, and our brother is writhing in pain on the ground, and then the black guy says:
"Guys, what's wrong? I was just passing by."
What will the skinheads do to the lone black guy who shot at them with a non-lethal weapon in response to his attempt to negotiate?

which, as it seems to me, we have already approached quite closely.

It seems to me that we haven't moved anywhere since the end of the prologue. Unless we consider the familiar "I'm done" as the ending, regardless of who says it.

If we take him out and everyone survives, remaining unharmed, meaning the best-case scenario occurs, then we... get nothing.

There are formally two possible outcomes: we can be seen as heroes for eliminating a dangerous individual, or as criminals for killing an ordinary (albeit eccentric) person who wasn't plotting anything, and who was an acquaintance of Rutger. Personally, I would rather fail the first option.

this is a murderer - the cat doesn't like him

The cat's reaction was one of the reasons why the decision was made to initially shoot at him, as I understand it.
However, no one bothered to analyze it even minimally, to see if it actually meant that, or if it meant "be careful" or "it's better to walk away from this crazy person." And I strongly suspect that the cat was misunderstood.