Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
That moment when you claimed that a mafia member would protect another player from being executed, especially when evidence against them was found.
I didn't say that. I said that it's not in Necoran's best interest to hang Inar, because Chinaxa still needs to kill someone. And for that, Necoran needs either mafia members or Inar.
In my opinion, Necoran can handle Chinax on his own.
If he goes to kill him directly with his ultimate ability, he will be vulnerable to a counterattack. The resurrected puppet can be destroyed by being killed, executed, or exorcised. Chinax cannot be executed during the day. So, the options are either Inar or mages. Besides, if Inar is executed, he cannot be resurrected as a puppet (apparently).
I'm open to receiving justified criticism about my daytime gameplay from Ment, Medzh, or someone else after the game, but not from you, sorry. If it weren't for the nighttime action that opened everyone's eyes, there's zero peacefulness in your game 🙃
I'm not criticizing the effectiveness or style of your gameplay in any way; I just don't consider you to be peaceful because of all these inconsistencies. Or, at the very least (with a lower probability), you're a peaceful player focused on suboptimal strategies that I disagree with. If this came across as harsh or a personal attack, I apologize; that wasn't my intention, but I think you can understand that, from my perspective, such behavior is worthless and looks like a deliberate attempt to undermine me. Especially in combination with the other factors. Author
I didn't say that. I said that it's not in Necoran's best interest to eliminate Inar, because someone still needs to kill Chinaxa. And Necoran needs either the Mafia or Inar for that.
You said that "any peaceful player would vote to eliminate Medzh," and "if you're not Inar, why did you say that Inar is useful?" So, you think a peaceful player would defend someone who would be eliminated instead of them? The fact that you came up with something about Necoran also doesn't matter – you tried to get me eliminated based on evidence against Inar. All this shifting – we'll eliminate one role, but okay, maybe we'll hit another one, the evidence is still good – looks like wishful thinking at best, and a clumsy reveal at worst. Author
No, come on, how can he be 1000% peaceful? 1,000,000% after that brilliant move.
You can say whatever you want about me, but I won't let anyone slander Heroista after yesterday. It would have been beneficial for absolutely every non-peaceful player to have me eliminated. What he did makes him a thousand times more trustworthy, whether you exaggerate or not. I'm now ready to support him in anything.
You said that "any peaceful player would vote to lynch Meja," and "if you're not Inar, why did you say Inar is useful?" So, according to you, would a mafia player defend someone who would be lynched instead of them? The thing you came up with about Necoran also doesn't matter – you were voting to lynch me based on evidence against Inar. All this waffling – we're voting for one role, but okay, maybe we'll end up voting for another, but the evidence is still good – to me, looks at best like wishful thinking, and at worst like a clumsy attempt to mislead.
There is a clear misunderstanding in this issue. Everything is mixed up.