Posts from NCF – Extended list of Neutral creatures.

doesn't open the gates (is it a demon)?

Even though it's relatively weak under the computer's control, it moves around nicely.

Although the troglodytes had an extra +20 attack, luck, and double retaliation, they were quickly defeated in the auto-battle from each side. The battle is indeed skewed by the Dominion rings that each one has, which dropped randomly.

I've added a battle recording, but I don't know if it will open and display correctly, especially if you don't have memory mentors (creatures with 999) and some other things.

I was just thinking about something.

There's a Fire Gremlin creature.

Attack 3, defense 2, speed 4, initiative 10, 6 HP, 5 shots.

Compared to the regular upgraded Gremlin, it has +1 attack, -2 shots, -1 speed, -1 initiative, and -1 skill.
Compared to the Pest Gremlin, it's even worse: -2 attack, -2 defense, -2 shots, -1 speed, -2 initiative.

Also, the standard upgraded Gremlin has 1 Repair, while the Pest Gremlin has infinite Sabotage.
The Fire Gremlin has only 1 Fire Sign (which is 2 shots less), which doesn't do much damage. It's weaker in stats and speed.
But it has a growth rate of 10 instead of 20.

I would understand if it could set things on fire infinitely or 20-50 times, but how did it end up like this?

Added 1 minute ago
and yes, in its original form, it refused to accept magical artifacts, but I fixed that for myself.

A neutral creature should generally be stronger than a standard unit, but this one is not only moderately strong physically, but also noticeably weaker. And there will be twice as few of them. When they appear, their "sign" (+/-) deals little damage, just like a shot, and it seems that shooting might even deal more damage – I'm not sure how the ranged attack penalty works in melee combat here. If it couldn't shoot at all, but could endlessly apply the "sign of fire," that would be a completely different creature, with a purpose as a ranged attacker, and even with these stats, it would be more desirable than a gremlin. Here, even a downgraded gremlin will be better simply because there are twice as many of them.

And if you look at a battle for a mine, for example, where they are on their own without a company of fire mages, their "sign of fire" is completely useless as a debuff.

A peasant is actually not the worst unit in the 3rd game.
If you play with the Lords of Life skill, all unupgraded troops (except skeletons) under the command of your hero are automatically upgraded to the next level the next day. And peasants turn into upgraded troops of any of your heroes, except for Necromancers. It's even easier for Necromancers – the Transmuter works even without Lords of Life.

And their growth rate is 25. 25 halberdiers with 14 base HP + 50% from rank 10 is not bad as an addition to their growth rate of 28 from the Castle.

They are weak, of course, but incredibly useful.)))

If you take the 4th game, peasants are the worst unit. BUT – they bring in 1 coin per day. Playing as a Necromancer and simply accumulating an army through the Transmuter, I would discard my Imps, and I wouldn't touch the peasants of the Lords of Life and Lords of Nature!
In Equilibrium, they bring in 2 coins per day, which is twice as useful – I don't play it because of the changed balance, which is not for the better, but still.

Is there a way to fix the situation where, when choosing an arch-enemy for a Ranger, “hundreds” of Yetis are immediately available in the selection list?