Posts from Mafia 110. Heckelia
Auto-translated
somehow sucked up to the suddenly appearing Crabby
Added 45 seconds later
Whoever executes Morny is a...
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт
Got kicked in chat.
I've mentioned several times that I'm a Town role. I'm not playing to win this game, so I won't bother arguing; I'll just reiterate that the clue was misinterpreted, and it will result in a Town death. I've only read the literary descriptions of all three female roles in the setting; I haven't even looked at the clues, so I'm playing completely randomly. Nevertheless, I represent a Town-aligned character, with a voice and corresponding abilities. If you've calculated the risks and believe that executing such a Town role is acceptable at this stage of the game, then go ahead and execute me; I can't stop you. Just be aware that this will result in a Town death, and I might also suggest that you consider the circumstances of my death. Specifically, how you spent the entire day debating the clue, trying to connect it to Medusa or other players, but were hesitant, and then Nebo joined the discussion, came up with a solution in ten steps, voted for me, and then Crabbi, who appeared out of nowhere, also voted for me. And now, at the end of the day, you're adding more votes without any further explanation. All this, despite the fact that there was nothing against me throughout the game. So...
If you only read the literary descriptions of all three female roles, where did the reasoning about Inara's usefulness come from before the clue even appeared? What specifically do you dislike about the solution? How do you propose identifying the Negatives if not through the clues? And what do you think I should have been doing during the day instead of "weakly discussing the clue"? Should I have been weakly discussing psychology?
Yashur, do you consider Tox peaceful or not?
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Whoever executes Morny is...
Why?
Where did the reasoning about Inar's usefulness come from, even before you had any evidence?
Небо – угроз не слышит
Небо – ведёт особый счёт
Небо – тебя найдёт
I think Ples started this, right?
And he continued
Added 2 minutes later
Whoever executes Morny is a...
ToX, this isn't the first time you've come, posted a questionable comment, and left without any explanation.
If you only read the literary descriptions of all three female roles, where did the reasoning about Inara's usefulness come from, even before you had any evidence? What specifically don't you like about the solution? How do you suggest identifying the culprit if not based on evidence? And what should I have been doing during the day, in your opinion, instead of "listlessly analyzing the evidence"? Listlessly analyzing the psychology?
Because it's incorrect, because I'm not the culprit.
And how are they usually identified? Most often, it's based on a combination of factors, such as alibi, the result of the investigation, daytime behavior, and evidence. I have nothing except the ten-step evidence, which is one of many pieces of evidence pointing to different people, and the lack of usefulness during the day. I didn't play the previous game, but I know from snippets that you failed to identify Arandor during the day based on evidence, and maybe that caused someone to feel guilty. If I'm wrongly accused today, you will clearly see that it's not working, even with a good piece of evidence. There is no perfect way to cheat, dismiss all possible points of analysis, and identify the culprit quickly in this game situation.

В тихой однообразной жизни всегда так бывает: каждый отдельный день бесконечно долог, но месяцы и годы мчатся с непостижимой быстротой.
I wanted to offer you some flowers, but a crown would suit a princess like you much better
Смысл жизни в том, что жизнь на тебе не заканчивается
I didn't understand the question. Because it's incorrect, since I'm not a "man." And how are they usually determined? Most often, it's based on a combination of factors, such as blocking, the result of a check, daytime behavior, and evidence. There's nothing against me except for a ten-step piece of evidence, one of many against different people, and a lack of usefulness during the day. I haven't read the previous game, but I know from snippets that you lost to Arandor during the day, not based on evidence, and maybe that caused someone to feel guilty. If I'm eliminated today, you'll clearly see that it's only based on evidence, and even a good connection doesn't work. There's no perfect way to cheat, dismiss all possible points of analysis, and quickly determine negativity in such a game situation.
I started after Los recommended that we not execute Medj or Inar right now. But I'm not sure if Los himself was guided by pragmatic considerations, or if he just wanted to save his favorite NPC.