Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Favorites, into battle! - 11.Auto-translated
I don't understand how anyone can consider the Tower a weak castle, given the pool of templates available now. A Tower with a Bibliophile on top is stronger than almost half of the castles – if you know how to build it.
Could you elaborate on which templates you're referring to? And which castles? Just based on my experience, even on a low-mana map, even against Swamp, Inferno, or Citadel, during trading, I often end up selling the choice to my opponent, and I get the Tower with a positive mana regeneration (of course, the level of both me and my opponents isn't very high, but still...).
"There's no need to execute me,sir Davos . I'll be dead before dawn." ICQ 716748479
So, once again. If the rule for restructuring the library is only activated when there is at least one starting tower in the game, what are the drawbacks of this option, Caliban?
may I inquire, on which templates exactly? And which towns? Simply from my experience, even on LM, even against Boneyard, Inferno or Citadel, I usually start with a positive rollback for Tower (it's clear that both my level and that of my opponents are not high, but still...)
you answered your own question Russel_lDHl
So, once more. If the rule for the Library restructuring only activates when there is at least one starting Tower present in the game — what are the downsides of this option, Caliban?
no downsides. the main thing is that both players can use this Library restructuring (in case the second player finds a Tower)
no downsides. the main thing is that both players can use this library upgrade (in case the second player finds the Tower).
That's exactly how it is - the library upgrade either exists (the checkbox is enabled) or the library is not upgraded; this setting is global, for the entire game and for all castles on the map. In my opinion, it's done perfectly. So, a rather old rule, which was usually agreed upon verbally with opponents before the start of the game, could be written here as well.
No. I asked you to answer which templates and which castles you were referring to. You said that most of them are like that. I'm not asking for much, I'm not asking you to spend a lot of time on a detailed answer (explaining the reasons, etc.), just list them.
"There's no need to execute me,sir Davos . I'll be dead before dawn." ICQ 716748479
Belly, if you think that every time I mention Igromant I have to grab my stomach and laugh my ass off, then you have issues with your sense of humor, at the very least. If you think I'm bullying him or anyone else, then you need to come back to our reality. In fact, without any sarcasm or jokes and certainly without any humiliation, I spoke about this player as he is. The bit about my self-assertion is especially funny, considering you don't know me at all. But the young psychologist on the internet wants to show how smart he is, but it didn't turn out so well.
You've already crushed everyone with your "intellect," that's enough.
Eh, pretty weak, though not surprising. Alright, here we go. I'll add some mathematical analysis to this boring flame war.
First sentence is pointless - 1/10. Mentioning a sense of humor characteristic — in an argument, that's a fourth-grade move, you're not sharp enough to pull that off. (Let me explain: I can say the same about you here — and you're already left looking foolish, try again)
Second — 3/10, a bit better, but this is countered by a simple analysis of your messages directed at this person: you have repeatedly written messages solely for the purpose of mockery, and if you dare to contradict my words, then, brother, you should go read an old Soviet book, "Introduction to Logic" by Povarnin.
Third — 0/10, no comment, this is what they call a "point of view." Even if it's mistaken, it doesn't concern me. I'm not here to change your opinion about a person.
Fourth — again pointless — 1/10. I don't have to know you in person to state facts so obvious to a sound mind. (A simple analysis, based on which I considered it necessary to note this ailment in you (check you for lice), turned out to be overly unpleasant for you, and it struck a nerve — nothing to be done about that.)
Fifth — 2/10 — one point for each part. However, using words like "young," "psychologist," "internet" immediately gives me the win here. YouTube level, a herd argument, downright disgusting. As people like to say nowadays, "Oh, c'mon," guys, you're on HeroesWorld, act accordingly.
And finally, sixth — 0/10 — I won't give more, and for what? You were too lazy to come up with something nicer, "same to you" — that's not HeroesWorld level, unless I compare it with the VK level here))
You can write your comeback in the same style, you're welcome)
Yay! Finally, they provided some serious analysis. We're waiting for a response and will adjust accordingly:smile23: Kaliban, please respond separately – first to Puzzu, and then in another message to Davos – the response regarding the Tower should be left in this thread.
I'm also interested. Well, I understand that the Tower is ahead. 1) In Ludomania on Anarchy 2) In Combat on 8mm6, maybe he can compete, on CM, but it's not ahead, is it? 18:29 stats in CM Masters On HL+U, it's not a dead Castle, but it's not ahead either, is it? And it's not better than the favorites? But you seemed to suggest that it's ahead on most matchups... against Necropolis, Conflux, Dungeon, Castle? Are you serious?
On the Small Map, Rampart is definitely ahead of Castle if you sell Necropolis or Dungeon for a higher price, considering good trading opportunities. Although, on the Small Map, Rampart also gets added to the top. Conflux is ahead on any map.
There's no trading for cities among favorites. And if the Tower is behind Conflux, Necropolis, Dungeon, and Elven cities in the standings, it definitely isn't even in the top tier.
But here's the catch. The phrase Caliban wrote is very intricate.
caliban
The Tower with a Library is stronger than almost more than half of the castles - if you know how to build.
"Stronger than almost more than half of the castles" - let's try to translate this riddle into Russian.
Half of the castles = 4.5
More than half of the castles = 5.0
Almost more than half of the castles = 5 minus 1 = 4.0 (it's quite possible that this is exactly what he meant?)
Stronger than almost more than half of the castles = stronger than four.
That is, if it's stronger than a castle, Swamp, Barbarian, and Inferno on the standings... that's already enough; Caliban's formulation works.
And if he meant the same for the other builds, he might even be right.
But it's unclear how this can be applied. After all, you also need to know how to build. Maybe you also need to know how to play?
Such calculations for the Tower will be useful for the guys in the top bracket, where there won't be a single Tower (FTS will be playing as Barbarians this time).
So, it follows from this that rebuilding the Library for the Tower will be included.
The issue lies elsewhere. There are 9 templates in the tournament. Among them, as many as 4 are XL+U, where, thanks to restructuring and good wizards, the Tower feels quite comfortable. Adding to these templates is Anarchy, where the Tower is at the top. As a result, we get that 5 out of 9 templates suit the Tower. They suit it in the sense that it can be suitable for a position against stronger castles, such as Necropolis or Dungeon.
theory is good, but here's how it actually is: anarchy is never a good choice against a Tower, unless it's Necropolis, against which playing it is more expensive. On higher difficulty levels, it noticeably loses to overpowered Necropolis and even against a decent Dungeon, and sometimes there are terrible defeats where you have to survive for 2 weeks without money and an army. Stronghold is okay, you can survive. Minotaur is very bad, only a found Necropolis or Grail can save you:D Therefore, the Tower, in general, will be somewhere in 5th place, being on par with Castle and surpassing Barbarians, Swamp, and Inferno.
Can I ask a question: what's the problem with asking the person who purchased the account for Heroes of Might and Magic Online to share it for playing together? Or do you think they'll steal it?
Can I ask a question? What's the problem with asking the person who bought the account for Heroes of Might and Magic Online to let you use it to play? Or do you think they'll steal it?
Your message made me think: some players who are very focused on saving time, and who think that 150 rubles a month is a small amount, could create a second account, pay for it, and give it to their opponents to play. Personally, I think there should also be a timer for playing with another account in Heroes of Might and Magic Online.
sir Davos Seaworth
