Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I suggest that the organizer consider a fundamentally different format for the competition.
Each participant manages ONE post. Their own. With all predictions and results. They write about each match in the following format:
First:
1. Russia - Saudi Arabia. Prediction: 2:0.
After the match ends, they edit the post, adding information to the following:
1. Russia - Saudi Arabia. Prediction: 2:0. Result: 0:3. Points: 0.
And at the end, they calculate their total points for the current moment.
Of course, editing technically opens up the possibility of retroactively changing the prediction to a more favorable one. But: 1) This is just childish. 2) All predictions are visible to everyone. Anyone who wants to take the risk is welcome. 3) We can establish (for this – for falsifying predictions retroactively) unclear, but definitely strict, measures of retribution, up to and including being added to the official Heroes blacklist. And I think that's where the downsides end.
The advantages, in my opinion, outweigh the disadvantages. The topic won't turn into a billion technical messages, and no one will have to calculate anything for anyone. In terms of calculating results, both overall and at any specific point in time, everything will be simpler by a couple of orders of magnitude.
I suggest that the organizer consider a fundamentally different format for the competition.
Each participant manages ONE post. Their own. With all predictions and results. They write about each match in the following format:
First:
After the match ends, they edit the post, adding information to bring it to the following form:
And at the end, they calculate their total score for the current moment.
Of course, editing technically opens up the possibility of retroactively changing a prediction to a more favorable one. But: 1) This is just childish. 2) All predictions are visible to everyone. Anyone who wants to take the risk is welcome. 3) We can establish (for this – for falsifying predictions retroactively) unclear, but definitely strict, measures of retribution, up to and including being added to the official Heroes blacklist. And I think that's where the downsides end.
The advantages, in my opinion, outweigh the disadvantages. The topic won't turn into a billion technical messages, and no one will have to calculate anything for anyone. In terms of calculating results and in general, and at any specific point in time, everything will be simpler by a couple of orders of magnitude.
In general, this is convenient for me because I put all the predictions into an Excel spreadsheet, and everything is structured there. If each person has their own post, I'll have to scroll through pages, go back, and I might miss something. And if everyone calculates for themselves, then what's the point of this topic?
Wyndoc
8 years ago
Auto-translated
Russia - SA 0:0 amen.
Sevan_80
8 years ago
Auto-translated
Please register me for the tournament!!!
Russia - Saudi Arabia 3-1
Egypt - Uruguay 1-2
Morocco - Iran 3-0
Portugal - Spain 2-2
P.S. I have added the results of the games for June 15th, as I might not be able to post after our games.
