Posts from Morale system.
Auto-translated
There's a suggestion: 2+ = 1-, meaning that the fewer posts, the less time since registration, and the lower the reputation (badges) a user has, the less they can influence the morale of other users per day.
Why does 2=1? The morale system is designed to show the user's value – this is stated among the goals of its implementation. So why does one good message have less value than one bad message – uselessness...? :)
If I understand correctly, according to the esteemed Alan, this nickname will be permanently banned. According to AmberSoler, it is clear that the owner of the nickname can be found.
We simply need to take decisive measures against this individual and make the information publicly available so that others won't even think about doing the same.
With respect to AmberSoler, LeSHiJ-MaX!
No, why change the balance... to prevent this from happening, you just need to limit users. That is, someone who has, say, 10 posts and a positive morale, can influence the morale of others...
You can argue with me, but I'll give you another negative rating and again write that you are wrong! What will you do in this case? Will you agree that you are posting useless content? I doubt you will... But you've already received a -20 reputation points. It's absurd.
This is just the beginning. The nonsense will only get worse.
Sooner or later, measures will have to be taken. But why wait?
As always, IMHO.
Added after 8 minutes
To prevent people from posting useless content, to severely punish them. :D But 10 to 1 is already too much, IMHO...
Should I show you messages that you are unlikely to consider useless and for which they give a negative rating? There are many such messages... We don't give negative ratings for useless messages; often, we simply use negative ratings to express our personal attitude towards the person we are talking to...
For total spam, for obscene language, for obvious aggression, you can give a negative rating as a punishment. But what does uselessness have to do with it? Let's think...
P.S. And what, can we justify him by saying he doesn't agree with anyone?
The system is malfunctioning. This weirdo "ytsu" appeared and started lowering everyone's morale. Take a look, for example, at the mapmaking contest thread; it's a complete mess, especially on the last page! Something needs to be done about "ytsu" urgently.
P.S. And is it okay to justify him, saying he doesn't agree with anyone?
The system is malfunctioning. This weirdo "ytsu" appeared and started lowering everyone's morale. Take a look, for example, at the thread for the best map contest; it's a complete mess, especially on the last page! Something needs to be done about "ytsu" urgently.
P.S. And is it okay to justify him, saying he doesn't agree with anyone?
A request has already been submitted to the creator to resolve this incident.
I think it will be fixed soon, and the reputation will be restored;)
Sincerely, VDV_forever
A request has already been submitted to the developer to fix this issue.
P.S. I hope I understood correctly.
If I'm not mistaken, the cause has also been eliminated.
P.S. I hope I understood correctly.
The user "йцу" himself has been banned from HeroesWorld, and all of his morale reductions have been canceled.
At this time, to prevent a number of similar possible cases, a restriction has been introduced that does not allow users with fewer than 25 posts to lower the morale of other users.
In the near future, two more modules will be added to the existing morale system, which will allow for the tracking of intentional morale reductions and correct the imbalance announced in this thread.
