Posts from Forum

Actually, Albert's variant is not bad. It emphasizes the "mutually destructive" aspect. There are very few such situations. And if only one is killed, then you can dig. So, in principle, it works well in SOD/HotA too.

Following discussions, the anti-gambling rule has been revised:

If both heroes die in a battle between players, and at least one of them had a level of 10 or higher at the time of the battle, then neither of them can be resurrected. If one of them arrived with troops at the beginning of the week, then the autosave from the previous day should be used. If both slots in the tavern are occupied by such heroes, then the autosave should also be used.

Three days have passed, and no objections were received, so the Al-Fayen version will be used.

I can only confirm that it seemed to me that they were trying to edit the formulation I proposed on one key point.
ATG immediately wrote that both ("2!!!") heroes must be main characters.
Lizzy also wrote about this in the tournament thread now.

I deliberately wrote about one hero. Because I thought that successfully killing a "dad" with a cheat should count as a frag.
But this is obviously suggested from my level of understanding the game. Obviously, both ATG and Lizzy suggest writing down only the option with a battle between two "dads".

Alex wrote it in such a way that I didn't perceive his post as an objection :)

There are 2 options in the poll:

1) At least 1 hero level 10+

2) Both heroes level 10+

We vote by posting in this thread. I don't care, so the decision will be made by a simple majority of votes.

The option of not imposing any restrictions is not even being considered...

You've been told this a hundred times. It's done to avoid draws due to people's unwillingness to play a "hero-digging roulette" (as was the case with Lizard and Delux), or to prevent wins simply because one player dug up a powerful hero with artifacts, while the other didn't.

What about the wishes of those who are not at all opposed to "roulette"?))