Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Sacred Haven of DebaucheryAuto-translated
Well, I tried not to rush things, but I've drawn my conclusions. I'll wait for the results and then act accordingly. I'm thinking about giving it about a week. Farewell, guys, you've become a family to me, and I really had a great time with you. Don't remember me with ill will.
[19:44:29] Smooth Shadow: Well, what else can I add? As Loken rightly noted, creation is always better than destruction. The results of creation will make some people happy, leave others indifferent, but they won't harm anyone. And destruction brings no benefit, only negativity. In other words, one can channel one's energy on HeroesWorld into something useful, rather than something that with a 99% probability will escalate into negativity within one's own company of comrades. After all, regardless of the voting results, I see no advantages in today's decision — only wounds on the forum and in the hearts of its denizens. [19:45:20] Drakkoshka: Well, I tried. [19:45:36] Drakkoshka: But the problem is that nobody cares about all my creative initiatives. [19:45:57] Drakkoshka: People are already laughing at my expos, the mafia is dead, my last contest had only one and a half participants. [19:46:12] Drakkoshka: Destruction is not the way out, I agree. [19:46:38] Drakkoshka: So there's only one way out left. [19:47:20] Drakkoshka: And don't exaggerate the significance of this event for the forum. [19:47:29] Drakkoshka: Well, a moderator-overseer just deleted a contentious topic. [19:47:31] Drakkoshka: Big deal. [19:47:36] Drakkoshka: Kick the moderator out and we'll carry on as before. [19:47:39] Drakkoshka: Everything's fine.
Am I right in understanding that this is a deliberate ignoring of an obvious truth in favor of an ad hominem argument? Furthermore, is it vague and lacking any factual basis, relying instead on some emotional or associative aspect? How many moments would it take for an adequate person to skip the post and move on to a more effective and constructive line of thinking? This might have worked in seventh grade, but now there are different standards for conducting discussions.
Небо
Heroist
