Beauty that you want to share. Auto-translated

Padme in the second one >> Leia in any costume.
Oh, Ethereal is impressed.

wanted to share some Leia pictures with you, wearing her famous bikini.

Isn't that considered erotic?

This is no longer just eroticism; it's art. No one censors various Venus or David statues, do they? Luke in the last picture of my post is >>>>>>>>> everything else combined in this thread.

This is no longer erotica, but art. No one censors various Venus and David statues.

In Arcon, things are censored.

They don't censor all sorts of Venuses and Davids, do they?

I never liked classicism. And images of a naked King David are simply indefensible, considering the biblical story (it's enough to remember why the name Ham became a common noun).
---------
Here is real art, not Leis and Venuses.

Now that’s what I call a great idea, well done.
And later, their descendants will unearth it and say: “Wow, what a classic.”

This is real art, not just Leis and Venuses.

Ancient people also indulged in such nonsense, and now archaeologists are deciphering the SACRED meaning of these creations, thinking that the ancients were trying to convey something important.

This is true art.

What? Is it only one pixel in size?)))

Take a closer look at the sprite when it's flying slowly; the hit box is drawn there.

The images of the naked King David are simply indefensible considering the biblical story (it's enough to remember why the name Ham became a derogatory term).

And I was reminded of King Solomon because of this. He had a harem with, as far as I remember, about seven hundred wives... I think it's somewhat unfair that at that time a righteous man could have many wives, and it wasn't forbidden or considered a sin, but now you can only have one wife, and if you have more, it's called adultery or fornication, in general, a sin. I asked a woman about this, who supposedly knows the Bible well, and she replied that God didn't approve of it, but due to the cruelty of people, he allowed polygamy. But I still don't understand how that can be. After all, it turns out that some parts of the Bible (like the Song of Songs) were written by one of the most cruel people, because few people had more than 700 wives...

The Song of Songs is pure eroticism.
King Solomon was known for his wisdom, and as a wise man, he understood that one should take everything life has to offer, and one can rely on God.

You were doing everything right.

Cruelty is a function of many variables. Solomon quite strongly condemned having relations with other men's wives, for example. And there was a lot of other positive things there. It is also important to understand that there is no ideal role model in the Old Testament, and no "author's remarks" are inserted to indicate whether an action was good or bad, even when it comes to mistakes (as well as positive actions of people).