Мафия 32. Asylum

I second Gur's post. Best regards, Vistrit

Hostor is a bit crazy, but I support him. With hatred, OMEGA.

I second Gur's post.

Sincerely,
Vistrit

I triple it.

With silent contempt,
The Sky...

Omega is never wrong. I'm glad about that.
Gur, Hermit, Lorelei... you should take an example from this guy!

They'll kill us all anyway, just later :( And we're not executing Hostor if he isn't Radonar :(

So, you're consciously going for a loss when there's a chance of winning with a different outcome? O_o Why?

If Hossi is Radonar, the city has a good chance of winning...
I'll take the risk.

Please specify what chances you mean. I outlined quite specific moves last night. What will happen after the alliance breaks. There are no chances of winning there. Either it's an excuse from a doctor-killer, "there are chances, but I won't say what they are, but I need to leave a vote for Hossi without raising suspicion," or it's just an approximate forecast that is incorrect.

Or he’ll eat you all!

Don’t believe him, none of you are tasty.

Don't believe him, you're all not tasty here.

Burned him. <_<

If I understand correctly, we currently have 1 maniac, 4 psychics, 3 bad doctors, and 7 good doctors. In this situation, it doesn't really matter which mafia member to eliminate.

Doesn't it? 4 psychics, we eliminate a bad doctor, another one dies at night, leaving 1 evil doctor and four psychics.

Seriously, what risk are we talking about? What are you even talking about?

Victory conditions:
Good Doctors: No Evil Doctors and no psychics who kill remain.
Evil Doctors: No Good Doctors and no psychics who kill remain.
Psychics: No Good Doctors, Evil Doctors, and no Lone Wolf remain.
Lone Wolf: No psychics and no doctors from either faction remain.

Here are the victory conditions. I didn't come up with them; the game organizer did. Is there anything written here that says psychics and the town win together? No, there isn't. So, what risk are you talking about?
Gil says, "Well, we'll kill the evil doctors and the maniac, and then we'll do something else, there are blocks and redirects, and the mafia won't kill because I trust them." What kind of nonsense is that? Okay, Gil can be understood – he wants to win together with his friend, he's caught up in this idea, and from the very beginning, he doesn't consider any other options except his alliance. From the beginning, he argues that the doctors are invincible because "they've figured everyone out a long time ago because they're not stupid," I wrote about this yesterday.
By the way, the maniac's victory conditions state that he can win together with the town. And the evil doctors have already weakened, and there's not much point for him to stick with the mafia.

It seems like Gil explained everything clearly yesterday. If we execute Hosa-Radonar (although he might as well be Rayna, and saving him from execution means losing a day), and break the treaty with the Psychos, the town is guaranteed to lose. It’s better to take a risk, hope for the Psychos’ honesty, and aim for a “stalemate,” rather than heading for a guaranteed loss. As for the evil doctors, it’s understandable that they have no choice but to vote against Hosa, but I advise the townspeople who joined them to think it over.

What beautiful story did he come up with? I don't understand.
I also came up with a beautiful story yesterday, so the city wins, 100%.
No proof, sorry guys, you'll have to find it yourselves!

I don't understand.

You won't understand; you're stupid and shortsighted.

Calculating the killers => repeating blocks on them three times => patch.
Is that clearer? :)
It's not about wanting to win with a friend; it's about wanting to win beautifully and not wanting to step on those who made this victory possible for the city. But I repeat, if we even try to do so, we will lose. Even if you can act like that, it doesn't change anything – the meaninglessness of such an action remains.
And Mann, whom Reinhardt places his hopes in, could have started helping the city tonight, but no – he decided to sit quietly and not bother anyone. Or were the villains 300 times stronger yesterday? :D

Vissy, do you need proof? Please, here is my post; you can no longer dismiss the argument "it's all fake":
/post/492183/

Meanwhile, the recruited "doc-killer" eliminates someone from the city.

That says it all. It's all "balderdash."

If the game's premise allows for a scenario where the town, almost in its entirety, and one of the mafia groups, also in full force (we won't consider the second one, as it's obvious), along with the serial killer, reach a stalemate where neither can win nor lose against the other, then something is off with the setting. But this is just my naive, short-sighted, biased, and incorrect opinion (*- jurors, please disregard this testimony!*).

That says it all. It's all "nonsense."

Someone. Someone. Do you think that no one from the city is known? O_o Not a specific role, but just a faction? O_o Everyone was shouting that, according to my assumption, everyone has figured everyone out a long time ago - is that what you mean here too?
Or are you talking about the fact that they can recruit? Do you think the recruitment option is better than the murder option? :D Well, yes, you're right, it could be even worse - not only will the number of city dwellers decrease, but the number of villains will also increase.
So, let's have you be specific about what you think the mistake, shortcoming, etc. is, so I don't have to guess what you're not happy with.