dnaop-wr
Auto-translated
Once, I wanted to find out which rank corresponded to which creature. I searched through websites and only found bits and pieces of information (for some individual monsters). I decided to collect data based on my own game results. I arranged the creatures in order (according to their points), identified the pattern in the distribution of points, filled in the empty spaces with the remaining creatures, and it all worked out. To verify, I played games to obtain a rank that I had only hypothesized – everything matched.
Although sometimes there might have been minor errors – but this was likely related to the computer's calculation algorithm (rounding of values, glitches, etc.) – highlighted in red.
But below the Medusa's rank, I cannot guarantee the values – there is no data, and I don't see any pattern. The Ogre from the basic table doesn't fit into its place, and what's in between is unclear. Let those who like to play at 80% (or who have data from such a game) complete the table.
And finally: the actual combat abilities of monsters may not correspond to the rank in this table – this is the rank for rewards.
Although sometimes there might have been minor errors – but this was likely related to the computer's calculation algorithm (rounding of values, glitches, etc.) – highlighted in red.
But below the Medusa's rank, I cannot guarantee the values – there is no data, and I don't see any pattern. The Ogre from the basic table doesn't fit into its place, and what's in between is unclear. Let those who like to play at 80% (or who have data from such a game) complete the table.
And finally: the actual combat abilities of monsters may not correspond to the rank in this table – this is the rank for rewards.
