Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Sacred Haven of DebaucheryAuto-translated
A Logician is a clever technician. An Ethicist is a damn humanities person.
Actually, "most" (you understand what kind) of socionics prefer to assign exactly this meaning. Ignoring the fact that an Ethicist can be smart and even logical. Not in Archie's case, of course.
My records in Solitaire haven't been beaten for several years, even though I've tried on different computers, and at home, they don't even try to beat them. So you're right. Lol.
I collected the Klondike in 37 seconds, what have you achieved?
Tomorrow holds no promises Except the ones we've made
For Balya, it's also too sensitive externally, and they are more closed off.
What are you copying from me about introverts?
No, I am a very logical person. I love logic, and it loves me. I don't do meaningless and illogical things almost. But it's a different matter if not everyone understands this logic, meaning they don't see it.
No, I am a very logical person. I love logic, and it loves me. I almost never do meaningless or illogical things. But it's a different matter if not everyone understands this logic, meaning they don't see it.
It's not that I'm illogical; it's that those around me are illogical!
No, that's not logical. The logic of life is based on life and death; spending time on games under these conditions is not logical.
Or do you think that only reviewers and journalists are here?
No, VisTrit showed in the movie thread who is here. This added to the picture. It's not great, but that's according to my criteria, but I'm not imposing them.
Brilliant. I'll offer you money, a lot of money, join my side. OLOLO, we will conquer this land. A typical "kill everyone" campaign with a light storyline.
I realized that in the 5th (6th?, 4th?) game, in 4 weeks, you have 200 devils and 3000 archers in your army. Is that right?
I was hinting that some people's statements can be equated to the delight of schoolchildren over a single-player game for about 50 weeks.
The logic of life is based on life and death; spending time on games under these conditions is not logical.
What are you doing here then?
No, VisTrit, in the topic about movies, showed who is here. This completed the picture. It's not great, but that's according to my criteria, but I'm not imposing them.
Where you failed halfway through and couldn't defend your flawed point of view?
Tomorrow holds no promises Except the ones we've made
I was implying that some people's statements could be compared to the enthusiasm of schoolchildren for the single-player mode, but only for about 50 days.
You're boring, so nothing can be done about it, but the world around you is exciting, right.
What are you doing here?
Just having some fun for the last day. So feel free to delete my account, or if there's a button to delete myself, I will.
Is that where you lost with half your army, unable to defend your flawed point of view?
I have nothing to defend. You were asked a question, and you answered. That's it. There was no argument. P.S.: Although, I don't know how it was for you, maybe you come home in a helmet because Heroes 5 is still going on:))))))))))))
Throughout the ages, it has always been this way. If people didn't understand something, they justified it by attributing it to the existence of God or witchcraft, after which they burned the person.
The key word was "schoolchildren," not "delights."
Don't do that, because you'll be in an even worse situation with that approach.
Meanwhile, your thesis has been completely refuted. Why did you bring it up if you couldn't defend it?
What thesis are you talking about? And in general, the statement "flowers are planted so that either they are planted or trampled underfoot" sounds absurd, don't you think?
How to put it... It's much more unpleasant for a student to fail.
What thesis are you talking about?
If I were to put it in my own words: "Books are for learning something useful that helps in life, like a DIY guide or a textbook on driving, and everything else is completely pointless!".
And generally, the statement: "Flowers are planted either to be planted or to be trampled underfoot" sounds absurd, don't you think?
It's absurd, almost as absurd as: "The logic of life is based on life and death; spending time on games under these conditions is illogical." "Although, I don't know how it was for you; maybe you come home in a suit of armor because Heroes 5 is still going on." "They're not memorable because they're bad; they're not memorable because you didn't play them in a way that would prevent you from losing."
That's it.
Tomorrow holds no promises Except the ones we've made
Ple-Sen
Wistrit
