Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

Arandorka once again steered the discussion towards talking about himself.

Arandor only thinks about one thing: "I love myself."

one does not contradict the other. if you don't have it, you don't need it to burn.

It does contradict. The task: wipe your hands on your pants. Let's go the other way around, if your pants are on fire, as you suggest. Pants on fire -> you can't wipe your hands, because the tar will ignite when heated, which means you won't be able to wipe it off, as the burning tar will completely stick to your hand. Therefore, the conclusion: if your pants are on fire, the task becomes impossible. If, however, your pants are not on fire -> the tar does not ignite -> you can easily wipe your hands on your pants -> the task is completed.
And don't lie, or I'll excommunicate you from the Haven.

No need to stir up trouble here. You said that it's not necessary for the pants to be on fire. But burning pants are a separate issue. Besides, hands are wiped on underwear; what do pants have to do with it? Why use them as a towel? Pants are on fire. Hands are covered in oil, and they can easily be wiped on underwear. So, even with burning pants, you can clean your hands, which means that these two facts don't interfere with each other and don't contradict each other.

Why wipe your hands on your pants?

because they have nothing else besides them and their pants. it's obvious.

Seriously, what kind of situation would you have to be in to set your own pants on fire and get your hands covered in tar?

Added after 33 seconds

because that's all he has, besides his pants. It's obvious.

And where did he lose his shirt?

at work.
and where was it mentioned that the owner of the pants set them on fire? anyone could have done it, even the sun.

Where have you ever seen someone working in a shirt at a job like this?

at work.
and where was it said that the pants were set on fire by their owner? anyone could have done it, even the sun.

You don't need anyone to set you on fire, not even the sun, so you did it yourself.

where have you seen people working in a shirt at such a job?

Use passersby.

anyone could have done it, even the sun.

Sunny?......

Have you ever seen anyone working in a shirt at a job like this?

Besides, we weren't even talking about work here. So, you could have just gone, messed yourself up, and set yourself on fire all on your own.

What makes you think we're talking about me? Provide proof. Why do you always bring me into every conversation?

Conclusion from Arkin's and my posts:
pants are on fire, underwear is soaked in fuel oil, the fire ignites the fuel oil, and it burns into the body of the wearer -> "go ahead and melt uranium ingots in mercury yourself." ©

Because you shifted the focus of the conversation onto yourself when you started talking about the girl you set up, because it was right after that that Vistrit mentioned the burning underwear, and he was clearly referring to you.