Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

Robespierre, which is what I am.

And who else are you?

in the anarchist, I recognized Robespierre, whom I am.

6. Rob

+1 to the 6th Rob)

nerd - rob

Sex is boring 100% rob
It's obvious)

LolXDD

proof
You don't know Archik's socionics very well :3

And Koshka is most likely based on her character, so we'll mark her as a pacifist as an assumption.

So, Archik is like Dost, right? And yes, there are also Hamlets in the image (quite obvious). Although, thankfully, I don't look like the type depicted there.

Rob has the face of an anarchist, that’s why I wrote it that way (I saw amateur art on Alki’s VK page, and they assigned these faces to sociotypes and divided them into four temperaments). As for understanding sociotypes, I don’t accept what’s on VK. That Rob doesn’t really suit me, and he didn’t even show up when I took the test. But Robespierre from another test (which I’ve mentioned a hundred times) suits me very well, and there’s nothing nerdy about him.
There’s also something in common with Dostoevsky, yes.

Here, in case anyone is interested:)

And as for being a "botanist," I'm probably the least likely to fit that category among the people here. I've never studied anything, never prepared anything, etc. And I don't think sex is boring; quite the opposite, actually.

And yes, I got Yesenin as a result on VKontakte, so you shouldn't rely on socionics.

And I don't find sex boring, quite the opposite, actually.

Are you drawn to the unknown?

No, I'm not into sex with guys. Although... no, it doesn't appeal to me. I'm more interested in closeness, but not in anything too intimate.

Although the proximity is no longer as unknown as it once was...

And as for botany, I guess I'm the least likely to fit into the category of botanists among the fluders.

Do you have anything against botanists?

No, but I don't identify with them. If I did, maybe it would be better, who knows.

Archie, it's hard to judge someone's behavior based on forum posts alone; to give an accurate assessment, you need to meet them in person. But you don't seem like Rob at all.

I provided the description. It looks like this, but some might be different, yes. The information varies everywhere.

I knew about socionics even before it became a widespread trend, because my mother was interested in it, and then I was too. I know what Robs are like. The descriptions differ in details, but the essence is the same. Moreover, I have 4 Robs in my close circle, and they are all different, but there is still a common thread that runs through them all. You don't have this Rob-like core. Well, at least I don't see it through the forum. I don't know how to explain it more precisely. And a person can type themselves for as long as they want, but there is a 50% chance that they will be wrong. I have a friend, with whom we analyzed a lot of people, and he is clearly a Balzac, but he kept insisting that he was a Dostoyevsky. And there are other examples. The most reliable way is not tests or self-typing, but typing by someone who understands socionics and knows you.

I knew about socionics even when it wasn't a widespread trend.