Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Ferlyuts flew closer to his own and threw a nail at Orvald's horse, missing. Avesom strikes Amvrosiy's horse with a precise attack. AP (3/5). The horse takes 85-25=60 damage (140/200).
Stephanie's turn.
Ples, you can choose who Aksel missed. Or I can just pick randomly. As you wish.
At Orvald's horse.
Honestly, with targets like these, shooting at all of them is more trouble than it's worth. I'd move closer then. But let's say he missed Ging.
You can, in principle, just move closer if you wish.
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
Clearly, he's not planning to chase. In that case, Ney, I suggest you take on Ferlyuts and kill him, so we don't end up with a fun montage being cut for us, while Steph is AFKing on Whitecalm.
Well, I'm generally not against it, but right now his damage goes to the masochist, doesn't it?
Alright, so he's not planning to chase. In that case, Nei, I suggest you take Ferlyuts and kill him, so we don't end up with a fun montage being cut for us, while Stef AFKs on Whitecalm.
Well, I'm not against it in general, but his damage goes to the masochist now, doesn't it?
Alas, it does. But now it's clear that he won't peel off from the masochist. So we'll have to pile on him together.
I see, he doesn't plan on chasing. Then, Nei, I suggest you take on Ferlyuts and kill him, so we don't end up with a fun montage being cut for us, while Stef is AFK on Whitecalm.
Well, I'm not against it in general, but his damage goes to the masochist now, doesn't it?
Unfortunately, it does. But now it's clear that he won't break away from the masochist. So we'll have to pile on him together.
Wouldn't it be simpler to just go for a direct attack on the tarantas right away?
Ferlyuts flew closer to his own and threw a nail at Orvald's horse, missing. Avesom strikes Amvrosy's horse with a precise attack. AP (3/5). The horse takes 85-25=60 damage (140/200).
Stephania's turn.
Ples, you can choose who Axel missed. Or I can just pick randomly. As you wish.
At Orvald's horse.
Honestly, with targets like these, shooting at all of them is more trouble than it's worth. I'd have moved closer then. But let him miss Ging.
You could, in principle, just move closer if you wish.
The question is also where I should position myself. On one hand, there's the option to move 4 left and 4 up under pumpkin fire. On the other — 7 right and stay in the lower position.
Anyway, it's long past time for me to go to sleep. So I'm shooting at Tarantas. Splash, pick a more convenient position, since I'm not sure which one is better. I see no point in moving a step closer and trying to target the wyvern.
The question is also where I should position myself. On one hand, I can move 4 left and 4 up under the pumpkin fire. On the other, I can move 7 right and stay in the lower position.
There's no critical difference, but the pumpkins are probably more convenient for positioning in the following rounds. Let's go with them.
The question is also where I should position myself. On one hand, I can move 4 left and 4 up under the pumpkin fire. On the other, I can move 7 right and stay in the lower position.
There's no critical difference, but the pumpkins are probably more convenient for positioning in the following rounds. Let's go with them.
So under the pumpkin it is.
Revan, can I decide which attack against me triggers a preemptive strike and which doesn't?
And another question, if the answer to the previous question is no, can I cancel the preemptive attack and reactivate it on another turn? Because if so, I will do that. And if it costs a turn, then I won't change position this turn.
Effects are removed by dispelling, actually, not by "the character's desire"... The judge's doctor could have removed them if she had been among you... Or Ninahisa with his strike...
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно. Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится. (Закон сохранения).
Злобный Ящур
